1988
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(88)90003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved algorithm for the computation of Kronecker's canonical form of a singular pencil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational burden lies with Step 1 in which the pencil is brought to the generalized Schur form. The computation of this form requires O(m 2 n) operations for the m×n pencil zM P −N P , provided the efficient algorithm in [3] is used. Moreover, the algorithm in [3] uses solely unitary transformations leading to numerical backward stability.…”
Section: Basic Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The computational burden lies with Step 1 in which the pencil is brought to the generalized Schur form. The computation of this form requires O(m 2 n) operations for the m×n pencil zM P −N P , provided the efficient algorithm in [3] is used. Moreover, the algorithm in [3] uses solely unitary transformations leading to numerical backward stability.…”
Section: Basic Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of this form requires O(m 2 n) operations for the m×n pencil zM P −N P , provided the efficient algorithm in [3] is used. Moreover, the algorithm in [3] uses solely unitary transformations leading to numerical backward stability. Reordering of eigenvalues or generalized eigenvalues is potentially needed in each of the first three steps of the algorithm (provided at Step 2 the generalized Schur type algorithm of [34] is used).…”
Section: Basic Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So we assume that f is a problem data, of the same nature as n and d. A similar analysis on complexity can be done for the pencil algorithm to obtain the staircase form (3). From [4,47] the complexity of the pencil algorithm is in O(n 3 d 3 ) when considering an average value for the null-space degree f . Our analysis is finer in the sense that we incorporate a term depending on the nullspace degree.…”
Section: Algorithmic Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was solved by Kronecker [19] (see also [16,21]). Nevertheless, the analysis of matrix pencils is still an active research area (see, e.g., the recent paper [18]), mainly because of numerical issues, or to find ways to obtain the Kronecker canonical form efficiently (see, e.g., [36,37,8,12,13,38]). Our main goal in this paper is to highlight the importance of the Wong sequences [40] for the analysis of matrix pencils.…”
Section: Introduction We Study (Singular) Linear Matrix Pencilsmentioning
confidence: 99%