2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-010-0511-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved adaptive sampling scheme for the construction of explicit boundaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
88
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We employ a POD-DEIM-Galerkin reduced system to speed up the computation. Reduced systems have been extensively studied for computing failure rates and rare event probabilities [6,5,30,13]; however, we consider here POD-DEIM-Galerkin reduced systems based on online adaptive DEIM interpolants that are adapted while they are evaluated by the Monte Carlo method during the online phase. Online adaptivity is well-suited for computing failure rates because it adapts the reduced system to the failure boundaries where a high accuracy is required.…”
Section: Expected Failure Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ a POD-DEIM-Galerkin reduced system to speed up the computation. Reduced systems have been extensively studied for computing failure rates and rare event probabilities [6,5,30,13]; however, we consider here POD-DEIM-Galerkin reduced systems based on online adaptive DEIM interpolants that are adapted while they are evaluated by the Monte Carlo method during the online phase. Online adaptivity is well-suited for computing failure rates because it adapts the reduced system to the failure boundaries where a high accuracy is required.…”
Section: Expected Failure Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Run high-fidelity physics-based models at points that adequately sample the boundary between infeasible regions and feasible regions in the combined vehicle state-control space X × U for a particular damage state d. An adaptive sampling algorithm can be used to pick points intelligently. 25 For each feasible maneuver point [x, u], assign the value +1 and for each infeasible maneuver point, assign the value −1. In addition, for the measurement quantities of interest, record their values for each maneuver point [x, u].…”
Section: Iif Damage Library Construction and Surrogate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Generate a second sample nearby the SVM boundary to prevent SVM locking (see [31] for further explanation).…”
Section: B Adaptive State-space Sampling Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%