2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved adaptive differential evolution optimizer for non-convex Economic Dispatch Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several research studies have addressed the significance of the objective function in maximizing power system reliability in economic dispatch. This objective is accomplished by integrating constraints related to power loss into the optimization problem while solving the EDP [60][61][62][63][64]. Table 3 presents a comprehensive summary of single objective function approaches in EDPs.…”
Section: Single Objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research studies have addressed the significance of the objective function in maximizing power system reliability in economic dispatch. This objective is accomplished by integrating constraints related to power loss into the optimization problem while solving the EDP [60][61][62][63][64]. Table 3 presents a comprehensive summary of single objective function approaches in EDPs.…”
Section: Single Objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are adaptable and can return several solutions to a single problem in a single simulation run. Several well-known optimization techniques have attempted to overcome these issues, including: Genetic algorithm (GA) [25], moth swarm optimization algorithm (MSA) [26],differential evolution (DE) [27], [28],simulated annealing (SA) [29], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [30], [31], spider monkey optimization (SMO) [32], grey wolf optimizer (GWO) [33], gravitational search algorithm (GSA), [34],fire fly algorithm (FFA) [35], spiral optimization algorithm (SOA) [36], harmony search algorithm (HSA) [37], [38], harris hawks optimization (HHO) [39], squirrel search algorithm (SSA) [40], artificial bee colony (ABC) [41], sine-cosine algorithm (SCA) [42], differential evolution (DE) [43], bacterial forging algorithm (BFA) [44], Fluid search optimization (FSO) [45], improved ABC (IABC) [46], modified BFA (MBFA) [47], hybrid hierarchical evolution (HHE) [48], whale optimization algorithm (WOA) [49], chaos turbo PSO (CTPSO) [50], hybrid particle swarm gravitational search algorithm (PSOGSA) [51], multi-objective PSO (MOPSO) [52], new global PSO (NGPSO) [53], quantum inspired glowworm swarm optimization (QGSO) [54], multi-objective DE based PSO (MODE/PSO) [55], combination of continuous greedy randomized adaptive search procedure and modified differential evolution (CGRASP-MDE), combination of continuous greedy randomized adaptive search procedure and self-adaptive differential evolution (C-GRASP-SaDE) [56], successful history-based adaptive DE variants with linear population size reduction (L-SHADE) and improved L-SHADE (IL-SHADE) [57].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, metaheuristic algorithms have been classified into four categories [10]: evolution-based algorithms (EA), such as EMO [11], IL-SHADE [12], MPDE [13], DPADE [14], L-HMDE [15], SDO [16], RA [17], BSA [18,19], DSC-ATMAES [20], etc. ; swarm-based algorithms (SA)-QPGPSO-w [21], MABC [22], CCSO, iCSPM [23,24], CBA [25], AGWO [26], ISSO [27], HHO [28], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%