2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/6467957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved 3D Shape Recognition Method Based on Panoramic View

Abstract: Recognition of three-dimensional (3D) shape is a remarkable subject in computer vision systems, because of the lack of excellent shape representations. With the development of 2.5D depth sensors, shape recognition is becoming more important in practical applications. Many methods have been proposed to preprocess 3D shapes, in order to get available input data. A common approach employs convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which have become a powerful tool to solve many problems in the field of computer vision… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are five convolution layers in the 3V-DepthPano which use the Alexnet model [27]. Both Panoramic View [3] and DeepPano use four convolution Blocks with one convolution layer for each block, followed by a max-pooling layer, compared with four convolution layers in our method. The number of parameters in the fully-connected layers is not compared because there is no information on the number of feature vectors of this layer in the DeepPano method in [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are five convolution layers in the 3V-DepthPano which use the Alexnet model [27]. Both Panoramic View [3] and DeepPano use four convolution Blocks with one convolution layer for each block, followed by a max-pooling layer, compared with four convolution layers in our method. The number of parameters in the fully-connected layers is not compared because there is no information on the number of feature vectors of this layer in the DeepPano method in [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems hard to select deep learning techniques directly for 3D shape recognition. Unlike the general data formation of 2D images, the extraordinary formation of 3D shapes, such as Point Clouds and meshes as direct inputs for CNN, is one of the most challenging in CNN generalization from 3D shapes to 2D images [3]. Presentations obtained for 3D shapes have significantly affected the performance of shape recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PointNet [17] 77.60% N/A 3D ShapeNets [16] 83.54% 77.32% Geometry Image [18] 88.40% 83.90% DeepPano [19] 88.66% 82.54% PanoramicView [24] 89.80% 82.47% Our Method 90.20% 84.64%…”
Section: Algorithm Modelnet10 Modelnet40mentioning
confidence: 99%