2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0025315418000267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improbable opportunistic predator: the functional morphology ofPinna nobilis(Bivalvia: Pterioida: Pinnidae)

Abstract: The functional morphology ofPinna nobilisis described, with special reference to the uniquely pinnid pallial organ, the similarly unique buccal (formerly pallial) gland, the stomach and its contents. The pallial gland produces sulphuric acid which as well as functioning as a shell cleaning swab may be involved in prey capture. The buccal gland discharging into the oesophagus has proteolytic digestive functions while the stomach is adapted for the reception and digestion of captured, mucous-bound, mesozooplankt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with observations from previous studies suggesting the contribution of micro and mesozooplankton to pen shell diets (Davenport et al, 2011;Morton and Puljas, 2019) and support an overall central role of pelagic versus benthic food sources (Alomar et al, 2015). Our experiment with newly hatched Artemia nauplii also confirmed the actual ingestion of animal material, which was increased with the availability in the water column, thus supporting the description of opportunistic predator proposed by Morton and Puljas (2019). According to visual observations under the microscope, Artemia nauplii were only partly digested, which might also account for comparatively lower contributions of zooplankton vs. phytoplankton.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are in agreement with observations from previous studies suggesting the contribution of micro and mesozooplankton to pen shell diets (Davenport et al, 2011;Morton and Puljas, 2019) and support an overall central role of pelagic versus benthic food sources (Alomar et al, 2015). Our experiment with newly hatched Artemia nauplii also confirmed the actual ingestion of animal material, which was increased with the availability in the water column, thus supporting the description of opportunistic predator proposed by Morton and Puljas (2019). According to visual observations under the microscope, Artemia nauplii were only partly digested, which might also account for comparatively lower contributions of zooplankton vs. phytoplankton.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…60.2%), but there may also be a significant contribution of the zooplankton fraction (up to 34.9%). These results are in agreement with observations from previous studies suggesting the contribution of micro and mesozooplankton to pen shell diets (Davenport et al, 2011;Morton and Puljas, 2019) and support an overall central role of pelagic versus benthic food sources (Alomar et al, 2015). Our experiment with newly hatched Artemia nauplii also confirmed the actual ingestion of animal material, which was increased with the availability in the water column, thus supporting the description of opportunistic predator proposed by Morton and Puljas (2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shapes of bivalve shells are often indicative of life mode: whether the organism lives above or below substrate, how it feeds, and how or if it locomotes 7 , 8 . The relatively simple but highly diverse shapes of bivalve shells are frequently used to illustrate the concept of functional morphology—the idea that morphology can be attributed to ecological role 9 – 13 . In fact, the ecological and evolutionary constraints on bivalve shell shapes are so restrictive that even very distantly related bivalves living in similar environments show convergence on a limited range of morphologies 7 , 8 , 14 , 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The live mollusks that were sent to the laboratory were opened by cutting the adductor muscle according to the methods described by Morton and Puljas [32]. The in situ appearance of the organs was evaluated.…”
Section: Laboratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%