2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An implicitly coupled hydro-geomechanical model for hydraulic fracture simulation with the discontinuous deformation analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the DFN seems to be more suitable to simulate the water flow in fractured rock masses, irrespective of its high demand of computer resource. As a matter of fact, DFN has already been implemented into several numerical methods to simulate water flow in fractured rock masses, such as distinct deformation analysis (DDA) [18,[18][19][20][21][22], numerical manifold method (NMM) [23,24], extended finite element method (XFEM) [25][26][27], and discrete element method (DEM) [28,29]. Compared with other numerical methods, DEM coupled with DFN shows the advantages of simulating water flow through fractured rock masses, since it is capable of simulating coupled hydromechanical effect and, especially, massive fractures.…”
Section: Literature Review About Nuclide Transport Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the DFN seems to be more suitable to simulate the water flow in fractured rock masses, irrespective of its high demand of computer resource. As a matter of fact, DFN has already been implemented into several numerical methods to simulate water flow in fractured rock masses, such as distinct deformation analysis (DDA) [18,[18][19][20][21][22], numerical manifold method (NMM) [23,24], extended finite element method (XFEM) [25][26][27], and discrete element method (DEM) [28,29]. Compared with other numerical methods, DEM coupled with DFN shows the advantages of simulating water flow through fractured rock masses, since it is capable of simulating coupled hydromechanical effect and, especially, massive fractures.…”
Section: Literature Review About Nuclide Transport Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major difference of this pore pressure from the bottom hole pressure obtained in the field (Jeffrey et al 1995), or indoor experiments (Abass et al 1996), is that there is a sudden increase and it slightly drops to a stable value. This is because it is the real time pore pressure simulated within the rock and exhibits a different phenomenon (Ji et al 2009, Morgan et al 2015. Another reason could be that the permeability of the fractured element has been increased immediately after it is cracked, so the increased permeability could lead an increase in the pore pressure.…”
Section: Effect Of Poisson's Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past several decades, a great number of progresses have been made on DDA. These improvements are mostly concentrated on suppressing the false volume expansion, strengthening the deformability, scrutinizing the time integral scheme, refining the stress distribution, imposing the boundary conditions, fracturing the jointed rock mass, coupling the fluid and solid, accelerating the convergence of open‐close iteration, enhancing the contact search, optimizing the transformation of vertex‐vertex contact, and improving the calculation of contact force …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%