2010
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2010.530304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Implicit Basis for the Retention Benefits of Random Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Abernethy et al (2012) compared the efficacy of four different methods of perceptual training (viz., explicit learning, verbal cueing, color cueing, and implicit learning) and found that the training group that experienced implicit learning improved their performance in a retention test held 5 months after the posttest, an improvement that was not achieved by any of the other training groups. Rendell, Masters, Farrow, and Morris (2011) found similar offline gains in the performance of a motor task that was learned while experiencing high contextual interference (i.e., in which two or more different skills were learned concurrently and sequenced in a random manner), a form of learning thought to be implicit in nature. But why would a moving window encourage an implicit form of learning whereas a moving mask or full visual field would not?…”
Section: Do the Different Training Methods Alter Gaze In Unique Ways?mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For instance, Abernethy et al (2012) compared the efficacy of four different methods of perceptual training (viz., explicit learning, verbal cueing, color cueing, and implicit learning) and found that the training group that experienced implicit learning improved their performance in a retention test held 5 months after the posttest, an improvement that was not achieved by any of the other training groups. Rendell, Masters, Farrow, and Morris (2011) found similar offline gains in the performance of a motor task that was learned while experiencing high contextual interference (i.e., in which two or more different skills were learned concurrently and sequenced in a random manner), a form of learning thought to be implicit in nature. But why would a moving window encourage an implicit form of learning whereas a moving mask or full visual field would not?…”
Section: Do the Different Training Methods Alter Gaze In Unique Ways?mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…39 However, enhanced learning in the massed practice setting can be achieved by teaching a number of skills in a random order, thus disrupting the resident's flow and challenging them on each task. 40,41 A "pre-trained novice" 49 can be created by maximizing procedural learning in simulated environments, with the learner developing some automaticity and spare attentional capacity before their clinical practice commences.…”
Section: Task Deconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of the subscales (mental demand, physical demand, and temporal demand) are task-related scales, two of the subscales (performance and effort) are behavior-related scales, and the other (frustration) is a subject-related scale (Hart & Staveland, 1988). Rendell, Masters, Farrow, and Morris (2011) used the NASA-TLX as a subjective measure of learner's cognitive effort. In their study, learners assigned to random practice had higher scores than learners assigned to blocked practice on the measures of mental demand, effort, and frustration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%