2013
DOI: 10.1177/1053815113502235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Implementation Science Framework for Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Fidelity in Early Childhood Intervention Studies

Abstract: An implementation science framework is used to differentiate between two types of practices (implementation and intervention) and to describe how the fidelity of the two practices are related and would be expected to influence outcomes of interest. The two practices are the methods and procedures used by implementation agents (e.g., a coach) to promote adoption of early childhood intervention practices and the methods and procedures used by intervention agents (e.g., early childhood practitioners) to influence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
89
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both research and experience indicates that staff who see the value and importance of an intervention practice are more likely to seek out and participate in training to learn to use the practice, where the fidelity of the training received is likely to influence the fidelity of staff use of the intervention practice (Dunst, 2012;Dunst, Trivette, & Raab, 2013).…”
Section: Patterns Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both research and experience indicates that staff who see the value and importance of an intervention practice are more likely to seek out and participate in training to learn to use the practice, where the fidelity of the training received is likely to influence the fidelity of staff use of the intervention practice (Dunst, 2012;Dunst, Trivette, & Raab, 2013).…”
Section: Patterns Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development, implementation, and evaluation of the language intervention model and practices was accomplished as part of a model-demonstration project where project staff facilitated early intervention practitioners' understanding and use of the model where practitioners in turn facilitated parents' use of the intervention model practices with their children. An implementation science framework (Kelly, 2012) was used to conceptualize and operationalize the relationships between project staff, practitioner, and parent practices, where practitioner and parent fidelity of use of the language intervention model and practices were expected to be related to differences in interest-based child learning opportunities and child language development (Carroll et al, 2007;Dunst, Trivette, & Raab, 2013c). The project was implemented at four early intervention programs for infants and toddlers with identified disabilities and established developmental delays.…”
Section: Learning Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of linkages that Yoon et al (2007) call for are those that implementation science methodologists (Kelly and Perkins, 2012) consider necessary for demonstrating the direct effects of implementation practices (in-service professional development) on the use of intervention practices (e.g., teacher instructional methods), the direct effects of intervention practices on learner outcomes (e.g., student achievement), and the indirect effects of implementation practices on learner outcomes mediated by intervention practices (Dunst et al, 2013;Rudnick et al, 2012). These types of studies, and research syntheses of the studies, are the next generation of research that is likely to shed light on how in-service professional development influences and is related to both teacher and student outcomes.…”
Section: Snow-renner Andmentioning
confidence: 99%