2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2015
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2015.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Implementation of User-Experience-Based Evaluation to Achieve Transparency in the Usage and Design of Information Artifacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, it has been used to analyse other types of IA. However, an adaptation and reinterpretation of the included items was needed (Scholl 2015). In the case of the extension of the WISE Work Index, including TAM questions and items, it is related to the perceived advantages of working with the eAkte and allows a specific analysis of the impact of ERS innovations on any work in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In some cases, it has been used to analyse other types of IA. However, an adaptation and reinterpretation of the included items was needed (Scholl 2015). In the case of the extension of the WISE Work Index, including TAM questions and items, it is related to the perceived advantages of working with the eAkte and allows a specific analysis of the impact of ERS innovations on any work in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to gain insights into the quality of such information artifacts (IA), these should be analysed using a clearly structured and well-organized approach that specifically allows for the different usage scenarios and the variety of users involved (Scholl et al 2011, Taylor 1982. Evaluation tools have been developed, like the integrated application TEDS*MOODLE (Scholl et al 2014), which can be universally applied to different IA scenarios on different devices (Scholl 2015) for obtaining detailed user-experience (UX) data and which might also be an innovative solution for E-Government platforms and tools. Moreover, in general, technology acceptance models (TAM) (Davis 1985, Davis et al 1989, King & He 2006, Venkatesh & Davis 2000, Venkatesh et al 2003, Venkatesh & Bala 2008 are widely used tools for analysing innovations in implementing electronic government services.…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the aim is to evaluate the value added to faculty members as IT users, the most suitable model is Taylor's (1968) user-oriented model, which can be used to evaluate a variety of information system processes (Yoo and Park, 2018). The modifications to the model by Scholl et al (2014) and Scholl (2015) enable its use to evaluate internet technology. Accordingly, the value-added items are based on Taylor's (1968) model, as modified by Eisenberg and Dirks (2008) and used by (Kuo et al, 2009), with some items adapted from Fattahi and Afshar (2006),), and Nabavi and Jamali (2015).…”
Section: Methodology Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dimensions are divided into thirteen sub dimensions. Modified forms of Taylor's model have been used in the higher education context to evaluate e-learning value added (e.g., Scholl et al, 2014;Scholl, 2015). Hamid (2014) reviewed the following value added to the quality of education information systems: reliable, relevant, and easily accessible information about specific tasks such as a teacher or student, and educational outcome.…”
Section: What Is Information Systems' Value Added?mentioning
confidence: 99%