An implementation of the robust inviscid wall boundary condition in high-speed flow calculations

Kim, Moon Sang; Jeon, Byung Woo; Kim, Yong Nyun; Kwon, Hyeok Bin; Lee, Dong Hoon

doi:10.1007/bf03184384

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The body surface is one of the most important boundary conditions which should be implemented carefully. Kim, Jeon, Kim, Kwon, and Lee (2001) showed that the solution accuracy and stability of Roe's FDS scheme is affected by the wall boundary condition.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improvement of a solution of inviscid compressible flows using a mixed wall boundary condition

Madadi

Kermani

Khazaei

2015

Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Boundary conditions have a vital role in the numerical solution of the partial differential equations governing fluid flows, and they have a great influence over the numerical stability and accuracy of the final solutions. One of the most important physical boundary conditions in flow field analysis, especially for inviscid flows, is the wall boundary condition imposed on body surfaces. To solve a three-dimensional compressible Euler equation (with five PDE's), a total of five boundary conditions on the body surface should be prescribed. The wall's velocity magnitude is one of the parameters to be determined, and the way this velocity magnitude is calculated affects the accuracy and stability of the numerical approach. In this paper, four different methods for calculation of the wall velocity magnitude are introduced, tested and compared against several test cases of subsonic and supersonic flows. Since there are many problems where both subsonic and supersonic flows coexist, a mixed boundary condition takes into account the flow Mach number is proposed. The mixed boundary condition is applied to several test cases and the stability of the method is examined.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%