2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An implementation of mimetic finite difference method for fractured reservoirs using a fully implicit approach and discrete fracture models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Ω E denotes the cell volume. The expression for the interface fluxes in equation ( 8) is all in all similar to that generated by a Mimetic finite difference discretization (see, for instance, [27,40]).…”
Section: Weak Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Ω E denotes the cell volume. The expression for the interface fluxes in equation ( 8) is all in all similar to that generated by a Mimetic finite difference discretization (see, for instance, [27,40]).…”
Section: Weak Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its extension, the multi-point flux approximation (MPFA) variant, [5][6][7] is another popular strategy along with the mimetic finite difference (MFD) scheme, which has been recently used in a two-phase flow model in fractured media. 8 Nevertheless, the approximation accuracy in determining the fluid pressure and velocity, even on unstructured meshes with full tensor medium properties, and the continuity of the normal component of the fluxes through the interfaces of the grid, while honoring the mass conservation at the element level, 9,10 have made the MHFE an alternative robust approach. Despite a few drawbacks, such as the enlargement of the stencil or the breach of the discrete maximum principle, 11 MHFE and the pioneering nonhybridized version, the mixed finite element (MFE) method, have witnessed an increasing popularity in the last decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%