1985
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Imperfect Competition Theory of the MNE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each foreign market entry mode has advantages and disadvantages in terms of risk, cost, control and return in serving a foreign market (Anderson and Gatignon, 1986;Grosse, 1985;Hirsch, 1976;Root, 1987). The comparison between foreign production and exporting with respect to the risk-return/cost-control trade-offs can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Risk-return Trade-offsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each foreign market entry mode has advantages and disadvantages in terms of risk, cost, control and return in serving a foreign market (Anderson and Gatignon, 1986;Grosse, 1985;Hirsch, 1976;Root, 1987). The comparison between foreign production and exporting with respect to the risk-return/cost-control trade-offs can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Risk-return Trade-offsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since risk and control are related to a firm's costs and returns of doing business in a foreign market, the risk-return/cost-control trade-offs model is offered as an explanation of a firm's behaviour of maximizing profit by choosing the optimal entry mode for a desired foreign market (Grosse, 1985). According to Horst (1974), exporting is preferred initially; but as time passes and a foreign market expands, the firm will establish a producing subsidiary in the foreign country to achieve maximum profits.…”
Section: Profit Maximization Via Optimal Entry Mode Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ricardo's (1817) theory was also flawed because it was based on the assumptions of two countries, two products and perfect factor (labour and capital) mobility, but still did not justify international capital movements (Kindelberger, 1969). Other well-known scholars to theorise FDI include Mundell (1957), Vernon (1966), Casson (1979), Rugman (1980), Calvet (1981), Kojima and Ozawa (1984), and Grosse (1985). Although some of these researchers made a concerted effort to incorporate capital, location, industrial organisation, growth of the firm, market failure, foreign exchange parity, investment portfolio and product lifecycle theories into one whole theory to attempt to explain the motives and patterns of FDI, most credit is given to Dunning's eclectic paradigm (theory) of international production (Boddewyn, 1983).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also need for formal modeling of the MNE as an organizational mechanism and/or choice of modality of resource transfer. Again some progress has been made by Grosse (1985), Casson (1985) and Horstman and Markussen (1986), but more work requires to be done. Finally, there is need for a more systemic approach to examining the strategic behavior of MNEsusing, for example, such tools as game theoretic and network analysis.…”
Section: A More Formal Modeling Of the Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%