1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01442063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An impact parameter analysis of proton-proton elastic and inelastic interactions at 360 GeV/c

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[45]. We have checked that our results are similar if we take the Bailly et al [46] parametrization ρ(s, t) = ρ 0 (s)/(1 − t/t 0 (s)), [17] with the inclusion of the ρ parameter according to Eq. ( 22), compared to experimental vales (lower rows).…”
Section: Amplitudes and Parameterizationsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[45]. We have checked that our results are similar if we take the Bailly et al [46] parametrization ρ(s, t) = ρ 0 (s)/(1 − t/t 0 (s)), [17] with the inclusion of the ρ parameter according to Eq. ( 22), compared to experimental vales (lower rows).…”
Section: Amplitudes and Parameterizationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…[45]. We have checked that our results are similar if we take the Bailly et al [46] parametrization ρ(s, t) = ρ 0 (s)/(1 − t/t 0 (s)), where t 0 (s) is the position of the diffractive minimum. Nevertheless, the results in the impact parameter representation do depend to some extent on the form of ρ(s, t) [45] and the issue is intimately related to the separation of the strong amplitude from the Coulomb part.…”
Section: Amplitudes and Parameterizationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…[20]. Our results presented below are similar if we take, e.g., the Bailly et al [21] parametrization ρ(s, t) = ρ 0 (s)/(1 − t/t 0 (s)), where t 0 (s) is the position of the diffractive minimum. However, admittedly, there is some dependence 6), showing that that the range of the experimental data in q is sufficient to carry out the Fourier-Bessel transform for the values of b of interest.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Two quite different dependencies of hadronic phase have been then shown in the quoted paper. The first phase was the so-called "standard" phase (used, e.g., in [32] for interpretation of experimental data) and the second phase corresponded to natural peripheral elastic collisions. Both the hadronic phases are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Proton-proton Collisions In Impact Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 99%