An IMMPDAF Solution to Benchmark Problem for Tracking in Clutter and Stand-off Jammer

Waveform Agile Sensing Approach for Tracking Benchmark in the Presence of ECM using IMMPDAF

“…IMMPDAF is applied to track benchmark with ECM (SOJ/SSJ), clutter and multipath effects. The simulation results show that proposed waveform agile sensing method requires only 39.98 % lower mean average power compared to previous studies [10]. It is also evident that, as the number of waveforms are increasing from 5 to 50, both position and velocity RMSE values are decreasing.…”

“…2 demonstrate that average power in current research study is significantly reduced for all benchmark trajectories except for benchmark-4. The simulation results reveals that proposed waveform agile sensing technique requires only 39.98 % lower mean average power compared to past studies [10]. Besides that, the cost function C 1 , which is associated with radar energy is significantly lowered in the current method.…”

“…3. Table 2 shows results in the presence of SOJ, clutter, multipath and FA are compared with earlier research study [10], which ignored multipath effects. On the other hand, results in the presence of SSJ, clutter, multipath and FA are tabulated in Tab.…”

“…2, velocity RMSE in current study is higher than previous work with mean difference of 40.56 m/s. The earlier studies [10] ignored multipath in the environment. In the current research study multipath is incorporated in addition to the clutter and jamming, thus presenting a strong interference in the environment.…”

“…Benchmark problem with IMMPDAF was further extended by incorporating background clutter with fixed LFM waveform [10]. A new set of algorithms for radar management were introduced in [11], [12], which presented post detection integration techniques for benchmark problem to jointly reduce radar energy and to improve accuracy of target measurements in the presence of ECM.…”