2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-009-0384-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An immersed boundary method to solve fluid–solid interaction problems

Abstract: We describe an immersed-boundary technique which is adopted from the direct-forcing method. A virtual force based on the rate of momentum changes of a solid body is added to the Navier-Stokes equations. The projection method is used to solve the Navier-Stokes equations. The second-order Adam-Bashford scheme is used for the temporal discretization while the diffusive and the convective terms are discretized using the second-order central difference and upwind schemes, respectively. Some benchmark problems for b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With L ¼ 3D, the drag coefficient of upstream cylinder increases and the drag coefficient of the downstream cylinder is positive as shown in Table IV. The present simulations show good agreements with those reported in Meneghini et al (2001) and Noor et al (2009). Meneghini et al (2001) numerically studied the flow in interference between two circular cylinders in tandem and with side-by-side arrangements.…”
Section: Flow Past a Pair Of Tandem Cylinderssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…With L ¼ 3D, the drag coefficient of upstream cylinder increases and the drag coefficient of the downstream cylinder is positive as shown in Table IV. The present simulations show good agreements with those reported in Meneghini et al (2001) and Noor et al (2009). Meneghini et al (2001) numerically studied the flow in interference between two circular cylinders in tandem and with side-by-side arrangements.…”
Section: Flow Past a Pair Of Tandem Cylinderssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…5 which is the graph for the pressure at the point the front end (F ) and points rear end Rr on the middle ellipse (M ), it shows that the longer the major axis of the ellipse, then the pressure difference between the front and the end point is very small. The amount of pressure that is received at the point of the front end of the central ellipse can be written in mathematical models, namely y F = −2 · 10 −7 x 3 + 3 · 10 −6 x 2 − 2 · 10 −5 x + 2 · 10 −4 (9) and the amount of pressure that is received at the point of the rear end of the central ellipse can be written in mathematical models, namely y R = −3 · 10 −7 x 3 + 5 · 10 −6 x 2 − 3 · 10 −5 x + 2 · 10 −5 (10) where y F is the pressure at the front end point, y R is the pressure at the rear end point, and x is the length of the major axis of the center ellipse. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 In this way, the immersed boundary is identified by the volume of body function h in the following format h = 1, or the internal layer grid points 0, elsewhere…”
Section: Two Techniques To Resolve Oscillation Phenomena In the Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%