2020
DOI: 10.1002/ange.202012947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Imine‐Linked Metal–Organic Framework as a Reactive Oxygen Species Generator

Abstract: A new metal–organic framework (MOF) with both coordination linkages and covalent linkages is prepared by coordinating CuI with pyrazolate for an aldehyde‐functionalized trinuclear complex, and subsequent imine condensation with p‐phenylenediamine, a reaction typical for covalent organic framework (COF) synthesis. This MOF×COF collaboration yields FDM‐71 with honeycomb layers stacked in eclipsed fashion. After dissociating the CuI‐pyrazolate coordination in FDM‐71, the obtained organic components carry the info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful complexation of nickel ion with USTB‐12 is also verified by the presence of Ni signal in the XPS spectrum of USTB‐12(Ni). The Cu 2p XPS spectrum of USTB‐11(Cu) with trinuclear copper moiety displays two kinds of binding energies at 932.5 and 934.3 eV (Figure S18) due to the Cu(2p 3/2 ) orbitals of Cu I and Cu II ions, [9c] respectively, revealing the mixed Cu I /Cu II state nature of Cu element in this material. This is also true for USTB‐11(Cu,Ni) (Figure S18).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful complexation of nickel ion with USTB‐12 is also verified by the presence of Ni signal in the XPS spectrum of USTB‐12(Ni). The Cu 2p XPS spectrum of USTB‐11(Cu) with trinuclear copper moiety displays two kinds of binding energies at 932.5 and 934.3 eV (Figure S18) due to the Cu(2p 3/2 ) orbitals of Cu I and Cu II ions, [9c] respectively, revealing the mixed Cu I /Cu II state nature of Cu element in this material. This is also true for USTB‐11(Cu,Ni) (Figure S18).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the high‐resolution XPS spectrum of Cu 3 L 3 , the Cu 2p 3/2 binding energies at 932.6 and 934.6 eV were assigned to Cu I and Cu II , respectively (Figure 1d). [18,21] Cu II was derived from the oxidation of Cu I on the surface of Cu clusters, and the change of Cu valence had no impact on the cyclic triangular skeleton of Cu clusters [22] . Notably, the Cu 2p 3/2 binding energy of JNM‐2 displayed a slight shift of 0.5 eV in comparison with Cu 3 L 3 , which was probably attributed to the fact that the Cu clusters and the organic ligands were successfully linked by covalent bonds and an internal electric field was formed between them, thus facilitating the intramolecular electron transfer [8] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Beyond that, ordered materials constructed from CTCs are being pursued in very recent years for their controllable skeletons and excellent optical/catalytic performances. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The clusters herein are formed by sandwiching a foreign closed-shell metal cation between two gold(I) CTC molecules, resulting in an [Au 3 ]…M + …[Au 3 ] chemical formula for the resulting heptanuclear cluster. [6,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Since they were discovered in 1998, [28] few reports on structure determinations and luminescence properties only cover the central metal cations of Ag + and Tl + .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%