2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.642901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An imaging system that autonomously monitors lighting patterns with application to airport lighting

Abstract: This paper presents a novel measurement system that assesses the uniformity of a complete airport lighting installation. The system improves safety with regard to aircraft landing procedures by ensuring airport lighting is properly maintained and conforms to current standards and recommendations laid down by the International Civil Aviation Organisation.The measuring device consists of a CMOS vision sensor with associated lens system fitted to the interior of an aircraft. The vision system is capable of captur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach lighting was chosen because of the close proximity of the luminaires and the difficulty this poses for the unique identification of the luminaires. In addition, the approach lighting is elevated from the ground and therefore its performance cannot be assessed using the conventional ground-based methods such as MALMS that have evolved over the past few years [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The approach lighting was chosen because of the close proximity of the luminaires and the difficulty this poses for the unique identification of the luminaires. In addition, the approach lighting is elevated from the ground and therefore its performance cannot be assessed using the conventional ground-based methods such as MALMS that have evolved over the past few years [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is the probability that more than one blob corresponds to the same luminaire since the raw blobs extracted include not only the model luminaires but also those that can arise from the background (such as the horizon) and random image noise. Niblock et al [4] propose that other common problems leading to mismatches between the model and image data occur from factors such as inadequate sensor resolution, reflections causing stray noise, luminaires leaving and entering the field of view of the sensor and occlusions, where a luminaire is obstructed by an obstacle from the field of view of the sensor. In any case, the closest blob is always selected as shown in (12) and the missing blobs are thus identified.…”
Section: Correspondence Between Blobs and Template Luminairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations