2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-021-00901-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An image fusion system for corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunion

Abstract: Background To provide surgical support for corrective osteotomy, we developed an image fusion system for three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning and fluoroscopy. To assess the utility of this image fusion system, we evaluated the reproducibility of preoperative planning for corrective osteotomy of dorsally angulated distal radius malunion using the system and compared reproducibility without using the system. Methods Ten wrists from 10 distal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This highlights the potential of both image-based and inertial-based technologies to significantly enhance the quantitative evaluation of angles between segments or bones, as these systems typically offer higher levels of accuracy compared to the surgeon’s visuospatial perception alone [ 84 ]. Furthermore, systems equipped with orientation-tracking technology, such as inertial or camera tracking systems, empower surgeons to execute 3D angular deformity corrections, mitigating the limitations often associated with 2D technologies like radiographic imaging [ 36 , 119 , 141 , 142 ]. When conducting a comparative analysis between image-based and non-image-based technologies, the central point revolves around the requisite level of accuracy (when radiation exposure is not a factor).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the potential of both image-based and inertial-based technologies to significantly enhance the quantitative evaluation of angles between segments or bones, as these systems typically offer higher levels of accuracy compared to the surgeon’s visuospatial perception alone [ 84 ]. Furthermore, systems equipped with orientation-tracking technology, such as inertial or camera tracking systems, empower surgeons to execute 3D angular deformity corrections, mitigating the limitations often associated with 2D technologies like radiographic imaging [ 36 , 119 , 141 , 142 ]. When conducting a comparative analysis between image-based and non-image-based technologies, the central point revolves around the requisite level of accuracy (when radiation exposure is not a factor).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the recent advances in preoperative 3D programs for various procedures in orthopedic surgery [3,26,27], it is necessary to establish a method for comparing 3D models of a preoperative plan to 3D models during surgery. The method developed here has the potential to facilitate the comparison of intraoperative 3D models with 3D images of preoperative planning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%