2010
DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e32833b502a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ignoring task improves validity of cortical evoked response audiometry

Abstract: This study examined the basis for introducing an ignoring task during cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) using the N1-P2 response. Healthy hearing participants were assigned to two groups with and without an ignoring task (ignoring and listening groups) during CERA whose outcomes were compared with the pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in response to tone frequencies at 500-4000 Hz. The ignoring but not the listening group exhibited positive correlations between the PTA and CERA thresholds, and further showed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Breaks were given when requested. Participants were seated watching a muted movie of their choice with active subtitles and were instructed to ignore the stimuli played [28, 29]. The sequence of stimulus presentation in a session was randomized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breaks were given when requested. Participants were seated watching a muted movie of their choice with active subtitles and were instructed to ignore the stimuli played [28, 29]. The sequence of stimulus presentation in a session was randomized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unaided use of AEPs continues today as a means of threshold estimation. Historically, CAEPs have been used successfully to estimate behavioral thresholds (approximately within 10 dB of behavioral threshold) of both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired populations [7][8][9][10] ; however, in some cases unaided CAEP thresholds can exceed behavioral thresholds by more than 20 dB. 6,11 This wide range of variability in threshold estimation has the potential to cause obvious challenges in the hearing aid fitting process.…”
Section: Hearing Aid Fitting: Estimating Unaided and Aided Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, CAEPs have successfully been used to estimate behavioral thresholds (approx. within 10 dB of behavioral threshold) of both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired populations [2224]. However, it remains to be established whether such strong correlations between physiological and behavioral thresholds are maintained in the case of aided CAEPs, in which the stimuli have been altered by hearing aid processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%