An Identity Crisis of Architectural Critique

Tsiambaos, Kostas

doi:10.5334/ah.bi

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…'We know that these resistances must come to light; we are dissatisfied only when we do not provoke them in their full strength … these resistances are the essential achievement of analysis and are that portion of the work which alone assures us that we have accomplished something.' [50: p. 252] The argument made by this essay, is that all anti-theoretical discourse in architecture is nothing but a similar defensive reaction akin to the patient's secondary resistance when they are lying on the psychoanalytic couch; a reactive stance against theory whose underlying aim is that of blocking self-reflective awareness [51]. Reconceptualised as such, those uncritical discursive projections -including the re-emergence of populism in current Greek architectural debates -are essentially fragments of a transference toward the architectural historian, a transference that should also be analysed as a latent unexplored area, and hence as the rich prime matter for our theoretical inquiry.…”

Section: Final Thoughtsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Populism as Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse

Tsiambaos

2019

ARENA Journal of Architectural Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While the established histories of architectural theory generally focus upon the discourse produced by eminent architects and/or famous scholars, there is another counter-discourse that has developed gradually in the background. This is a discourse against architectural theory, in an effort to undermine theory's importance, even to eliminate its value, scope and use altogether. Yet this implicit anti-theory-which has slowly but steadily become embedded in the international architectural scene over the last decades-is usually ignored or underestimated by architectural historians. Drawing upon the recent literature on populism (e.g. Arditi, Moffitt, Taggart, Laclau), and also taking into consideration the few, but valuable, recent texts about populism within architecture (e.g. Fausch, Fowler, Shamiyeh, Lootsma), I will argue that a populist trend against theoretical inquiry is nowadays dispersed horizontally, thereby legitimizing particular, even if diverging, research methods and design practices. The fight against intellectualism and the elites, the promoting of a new sense of architectural 'morality', the use of simplistic procedures, forms and slogans, are among the many symptoms of a populist mentality that traverses ideological boundaries, social contexts and conflicting political identities, linking dreams of radical communal utopias to fantasies of limitless post-capitalist markets. This essay discusses in particular the ways in which such a counter-theoretical discourse has re-emerged in the last decades among architects in Greece. By examining the publications about twentieth-century Greek architects (notably Dimitris Pikionis and Aris Konstantinidis), as well as looking at the informal talks and interviews being spread today through the internet (such as greekarchitects.gr on the Vimeo channel), I will comment on how, in the case of Greece, a long established populist architectural rhetoric was, and still is, disguised behind various anti-theoretical façades.

show abstract

Section: Final Thoughtsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Populism as Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse

Tsiambaos

2019

ARENA Journal of Architectural Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An Identity Crisis of Architectural Critique

Cited by 1 publication

References 6 publications

Populism as Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse

Populism as Counter-Theory in Greek Architectural Discourse

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About