An <i>in vitro</i> Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets after Mouth Rinse

Singh, Jaideep; Joshi, Ashish; Manjooran, Thomas; Raghav, Swetha; Gautam, Ashesh; Patel, Jaladhi H

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2348

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, Singh et al . [ 35 ] have examined the effect of alcohol-containing oral rinses (Listerine), nonalcoholic herbal, and CHX oral rinses on SBS and found that alcohol-containing mouth rinses shouldn’t be used during fixed orthodontic treatment because they adversely affect the bond force compared to nonalcoholic herbal or CHX mouth rinses which have a minor impact on SBS compared to the control group. [ 36 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Preventive Dental Products on Bonding Force: An in vitro Study

Crowley,

Abdulhameed,

Al-Obaidi

et al. 2024

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Testing the effect of Fluoride, chlorhexidine, and molecular iodine applications on the mean micro-shear bond strength (SBS) of enamel in an attempt to preserve enamel integrity during the bonding process. Materials and Methods: The study was an observational case–control one in which 150 human teeth were classified into 10 groups according to the product kind and the prescribed treatment. Each group consisted of 15 teeth. Group C was the control group. Groups FP, FV, and OS utilized products that could be utilized in a professional dental setting. Group FP was treated with 1.23% NaF prophy paste, Group FV was treated with 5% NaF varnish, and Group OS was treated with Opal® Seal Fluoride releasing primer and sealant. Groups L, LF, CHX, and I were treated with mouth rinses. Group L was treated with Listerine Zero Fluoride-Free Mouthwash, Group LF with Listerine Zero 0.02% NaF Mouth Rinse, Group CHX with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, and Group I with ioRinse RTU 100 ppm molecular iodine rinse. Groups TP and G utilized alternative remineralization products. Group TP was treated with Fluoro Calcium Phosphosilicate bioglass containing toothpaste, and Group G was treated with Curodont Protect remineralizing tooth gel. One-way ANOVA test was utilized to perform all statistical analysis in this study. Results: For mean micro-SBS, no significant difference (P > 0.05) between any of the experimental groups was observed when compared to the control group. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between Opal Seal versus Listerine Total, Opal Seal versus Peridex, Listerine versus Listerine Total, and Listerine versus Peridex. All other experimental group comparisons revealed a nonsignificant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusions: As the null hypothesis (H0) assumes that changes observed in an experiment are due to chance, hence, the outcomes of this study are coherent with (H0) since the aforementioned application methods did not significantly impact the SBS of orthodontic resin cement to enamel.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Preventive Dental Products on Bonding Force: An in vitro Study

Crowley,

Abdulhameed,

Al-Obaidi

et al. 2024

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of orthodontic arch wires exposed to chemical mouth rinse show changes in the surface tomography and characteristics [28]. Study conducted by Singh et al, shows that Shear bond strength is affected more in the presence of alcohol containing chemical mouth rinse as compared to herbal mouth rinse [29]. Leaching of metal ions from stainless steel brackets have also been observed to be maximum in the presence of chlorhexidine as opposed to colgate plax and listerine, as reported by Danaei et al (9).Usage of chlorhexidine mouth rinse is also not warranted for long term purposes as it can be cytotoxic and deleterious to the oral tissues [30].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of chemical mouthwash and herbal mouthwash

Husain

Dinesh

2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The use of mouth rinse for oral hygiene maintenance has been advocated as an adjuvant to mechanical aids of plaque removal. The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial effect of herbal and chemical mouth rinse on bacterial accumulation on orthodontic arch wires. Materials and Methods: The study sample consisted of 15 numbers of 0.016 Nickel Titanium (NiTi) arch wires removed from patients' mouths, which were split into three segments of 1 cm each. Wires were dipped in solutions of Chlorhexidine (Group A), Befresh Herbal (Group B) and Distilled water (Group C) individually for 30 seconds and then in normal saline for one minute. 0.5microlitre of this saline solution was inoculated in a Brain heart infusion medium (BHI) for 24 hours and then examined for bacterial count. The obtained results were subjected to One-way ANOVA, Bonferroni and post hoc tests for statistical analysis. Results: Group A showed the maximum reduction in the bacterial colony forming units (CFU) after 24 hours with a mean value of 65.67cfu. Group B showed a mean value of 336.87cfu. There was a statistically significant difference between the Chlorhexidine group and the Control group.

show abstract

“…Some associations have advised using different preprocedural mouthwashes to minimize the viral load in the oral cavity and aerosols that originate during dental procedures (Banakar et al, 2020). Using these mouthwashes before and during the operative procedures can affect adhesive procedures as well (Catalbas et al, 2008; Singh et al, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some studies evaluate the effect of CHX, PVP‐I, and Listerine on shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel (Catalbas, Ercan, Erdemir, Gelgor, & Zorba, 2008; Singh et al, 2018). However, there are limited data on the effect of recently recommended pre‐operational mouthwashes on bond strength to enamel.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Universal adhesives are produced to bond to tooth structures via the etch-and-rinse (ER), self-etch (SE), and selective-etch strategies (da Rosa, Piva, & da Silva, 2015). Some studies evaluate the effect of CHX, PVP-I, and Listerine on shear bond strength (SBS) to enamel (Catalbas, Ercan, Erdemir, Gelgor, & Zorba, 2008;Singh et al, 2018). However, there are limited data on the effect of recently recommended pre-operational mouthwashes on bond strength to enamel.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How does antiseptic mouthwashes against SARS‐COV‐2 affect the bond strength of universal adhesive to enamel?

Özduman

Oğlakçı

Doğan

et al. 2021

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study compares the effect of different mouthwashes that have been recommended during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on shear bond strength (SBS) of universal adhesive to enamel in regards to self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (ER) modes. Flat enamel surfaces were obtained from 100 sound human maxillary central incisors. They were randomly allocated to five groups according to the different mouthwashes (no mouthwash/control [Ctrl], 0.2% chlorhexidine 1.5% hydrogen peroxide [H 2 O 2 ], 0.2% povidone-iodine [PVP-I], Listerine [L]), and adhesive application modes (ER and SE) (n = 10). After the application of a universal adhesive (single bond universal), composite resin (Filtek Z250) was bonded by a cylinder-shaped mold (height: 2 mm, diameter: 2.4 mm). They were subjected to SBS test using a universal testing machine (AGS-X, Shimadzu Corp.) (crosshead speed: 1 mm/min). The resin-enamel interfaces were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The semiquantitative chemical microanalyses were performed with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The data were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test (p < .05). In SE mode, Group Ctrl revealed significantly higher SBS than all mouthwash groups (p < .05). In ER mode, Group Ctrl showed significantly higher SBS than H 2 O 2 and PVP-I groups (p < .05). ER mode caused significantly higher SBS than SE mode in all mouthwash groups (p < .05). The SEM observations highlighted that Group Ctrl had a regular and intact hybrid layer with resin tag formation while the H 2 O 2 and PVP-I groups exhibited a thin hybrid layer in both modes. EDS analysis indicated that in SE mode, all mouthwash groups presented increased O content compared to Group Ctrl. H 2 O 2 and PVP-I that were suggested for preprocedural use during the COVID-19 pandemic, reduced the enamel bond strength of the universal adhesive in ER mode. K E Y W O R D S chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, mouthwash, povidone-iodine, shear bond strength 1 | INTRODUCTION Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which causes respiratory disease resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection, has become a major global public health problem since the beginning of 2020 (Phelan, Katz, & Gostin, 2020). The literature determines an approximate incubation period of one to 14 days for SARS-CoV-2 (Chan et al., 2020). Clinical symptoms of COVID-19 may include sore throat and/or reduction/ loss of smell or taste, cough, fever, shortness of breath, and muscle pain. However, the disease can be asymptomatic but still infectious

show abstract

An in vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets after Mouth Rinse

Abstract: Shear bond strength is affected with the use of alcohol-based mouth rinse compared with herbal or CHX mouth rinses.

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

Effect of Preventive Dental Products on Bonding Force: An in vitro Study

Effect of Preventive Dental Products on Bonding Force: An in vitro Study

Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of chemical mouthwash and herbal mouthwash

How does antiseptic mouthwashes against SARS‐COV‐2 affect the bond strength of universal adhesive to enamel?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About