1971
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.68.12.3140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Escherichia coli Mutant with Increased Messenger Ribonuclease Activity

Abstract: A temperature-sensitive mutant strain of Escherichia coli exhibits a remarkable increase in RNase activity when grown at its nonpermissive temperature. During growth at the nonpermissive temperature, there is an increase in the extent of breakdown of pulse-labeled RNA and a decrease in the functional lifetime of the mRNA for the lac operon. T7 RNA, which is usually stable in E. coli, is also stable in this strain at the nonpermissive temperature. It is possible that the RNase measured is part of the normal mec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The participation of a pre-existing ribonuclease in a starvation degradation process is in accord with the finding of Goldberg [ 121 that preexisting protease participates in protein degradation during starvation of E. colt The teleological arguments for having preexisting enzymes participate in essential processes during starvation when metabolic activities should be kept to a minimum are obvious, and clearly degradation of one molecule to completion before starting degradation of the other could be of great selective advantage to a starving cell. The experiments reported here with strain N4752 together with those presented earlier [4,5] show that the same lesion changed mRNA as well as stable RNA degradation, and therefore they imply that a similar mechanism is responsible for degradation of all RNA species in E. coli. If degradation of stable RNA during starvation is an essential function for survival (a generally accepted, even though unproven assumption), these experiments raise the possibility that perhaps the instability of mRNA is a by-product for the necessity of providing the cell with a mechanism to degrade its stable RNA.…”
Section: Febsletterssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The participation of a pre-existing ribonuclease in a starvation degradation process is in accord with the finding of Goldberg [ 121 that preexisting protease participates in protein degradation during starvation of E. colt The teleological arguments for having preexisting enzymes participate in essential processes during starvation when metabolic activities should be kept to a minimum are obvious, and clearly degradation of one molecule to completion before starting degradation of the other could be of great selective advantage to a starving cell. The experiments reported here with strain N4752 together with those presented earlier [4,5] show that the same lesion changed mRNA as well as stable RNA degradation, and therefore they imply that a similar mechanism is responsible for degradation of all RNA species in E. coli. If degradation of stable RNA during starvation is an essential function for survival (a generally accepted, even though unproven assumption), these experiments raise the possibility that perhaps the instability of mRNA is a by-product for the necessity of providing the cell with a mechanism to degrade its stable RNA.…”
Section: Febsletterssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…N4021 was an recA56, rnc-105 strain constructed as follows. A Pl-mediated transduction (15) was carried out with JC10240 as donor and N2100 as recipient with selection for tetracycline resistance (Tetr). A resulting Rec-recombinant, N4019, was then used as a recipient in a P1-mediated transduction with D10 (16) as a donor and selection for sorbitol independence (Srl+).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kivity-Vogel and Elson (6) and Lennette et al. (7) reported that the in vivo rate of mRNA degradation was proportional to the level of RNase II present in the cell. On the other hand, Donovan and Kushner (8) found no difference in the in vivo rate of mRNA degradation in either the absence of RNase II activity or in the presence of a 10-fold increase over wild-type levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%