2012
DOI: 10.1142/s0218202512500303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AN A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATOR FOR hp-ADAPTIVE DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS FOR ELLIPTIC EIGENVALUE PROBLEMS

Abstract: In this paper we present a residual-based a posteriori error estimator for hp-adaptive discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic eigenvalue problems. In particular, we use as a model problem the Laplace eigenvalue problem on bounded domains in ℝd, d = 2, 3, with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. Analogous error estimators can be easily obtained for more complicated elliptic eigenvalue problems. We prove the reliability and efficiency of the residual-based error estimator also for non-convex domains … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis has been inspired by [2] and [17]. The main difference between the a posteriori analysis for linear problems in [2] and the present a posteriori analysis for eigenvalue problems is the treatment of the higher order terms in the reliability results Theorem 4.2 and Corollary 4.6.…”
Section: A Posteriori Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis has been inspired by [2] and [17]. The main difference between the a posteriori analysis for linear problems in [2] and the present a posteriori analysis for eigenvalue problems is the treatment of the higher order terms in the reliability results Theorem 4.2 and Corollary 4.6.…”
Section: A Posteriori Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anisotropic a posteriori error estimator is stated in Section 3 and a proof of its reliability given, up to higher order terms. The proof of reliability follows the same general idea as that presented in [37], which in turn followed from work in [14,9,12]. In Section 4 we present three numerical experiments to validate our theoretical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is straightforward to prove efficiency of the error indicator (3.26) using the same techniques as in [37]; we omit the details for brevity. Unfortunately, as with many other works, for example [9,14,15], this efficiency result is robust only in terms of h. However, our numerical experiments indicate the error estimate to be robust in both h and p, even though theoretical results are not available.…”
Section: Remark 3 (Efficiency)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Amara et al [2] developed the upper bound error estimates for the Helmholtz equation in planewave basis enriched DG method, and the error is measured in the L 2 -norm. Kaye et al [18] developed the upper bound error estimates for solving linear eigenvalue problems using non-polynomial basis functions in a DG framework, which generalizes the work of Giani et al [11] for polynomial basis functions. However, the assumption of approximation properties on the function space is in general difficult to verify.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%