The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1090/mcom/3308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An $hp$-adaptive Newton-discontinuous-Galerkin finite element approach for semilinear elliptic boundary value problems

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we develop an hp-adaptive procedure for the numerical solution of general second-order semilinear elliptic boundary value problems, with possible singular perturbation. Our approach combines both adaptive Newton schemes and an hp-version adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element discretisation, which, in turn, is based on a robust hp-version a posteriori residual analysis. Numerical experiments underline the robustness and reliability of the proposed approach for various examples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following result, which implies the well-posedness of (8) even in the incompressible limit ν = 1 /2, follows immediately from [24, Theorem 5.1]. (13) holds true, then we have the inf-sup condition (14) γ a := inf…”
Section: Faces and Face Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The following result, which implies the well-posedness of (8) even in the incompressible limit ν = 1 /2, follows immediately from [24, Theorem 5.1]. (13) holds true, then we have the inf-sup condition (14) γ a := inf…”
Section: Faces and Face Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Such a setting has been considered in, e.g., [12,19], where reliable (guaranteed) and efficient a posteriori error estimates were derived. Adaptive algorithms aiming at a balance of the linearization and discretization errors were proposed and their optimal performance was observed numerically; see, e.g., [1,4,13,28]. Later, theoretical proofs of plain convergence (without rates) were given in [25,30], where [30] builds on the unified framework of [29] encompassing also the Kačanov and (damped) Newton linearizations in addition to the Banach-Picard linearization (6).…”
Section: Taking Into Account the Discretization And Linearization Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that, although (A.1) and (A.2) are not necessarily satisfied for this problem, our fully adaptive PTC‐Galerkin approach still delivers accurate results. We note, however, that divergence and/or chaotic behavior of the iterative procedure in Algorithm 1 may occur if initial guesses u 0 h are too far away from possible solutions of the PDE (see also , , ]).…”
Section: Application To Semilinear Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%