1999
DOI: 10.1086/302550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An HFE Intronic Variant Promotes Misdiagnosis of Hereditary Hemochromatosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may result in the incorrect assignment of homozygosity for C282Y. 66,67 However, under suitable PCR conditions this does not occur and the validity of previous publications is not compromised by this polymorphism. 68 It is clearly desirable to remove this potential cause of mis-typing by selecting alternative primers.…”
Section: A Pcr Artefact?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may result in the incorrect assignment of homozygosity for C282Y. 66,67 However, under suitable PCR conditions this does not occur and the validity of previous publications is not compromised by this polymorphism. 68 It is clearly desirable to remove this potential cause of mis-typing by selecting alternative primers.…”
Section: A Pcr Artefact?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homozygotes and heterozygotes for each of these variants, as well as compound heterozygotes for both, can be readily identified. However, there may be overdiagnosis of C282Y homozygotes in some laboratories owing to the presence of a common, innocuous DNA polymorphism near the mutation that may interfere with the polymerase chain reaction (28,45). A reevaluation of C282Y mutation testing in a large number of laboratories (9,32) failed to show the excess of homozygotes, which presumably can be accounted for by inappropriate conditions for the polymerase chain reaction.…”
Section: Testing Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other groups from different institutions independently reported that the sam e polym orphism interfered with the RsaI genotype assay, although in a smaller num ber of patients (Table 1). One of these initially questioned the validity of the assay in two apparent C282Y homozygous siblings when two instances of nonpaternity were required to explain the results of the family studies (Somerville et al, 1999). Another group identified three C282Y heterozygous patients who had previously been incorrectly labeled as C282Y homozygotes by the RsaI assay when a confirmatory DNA sequence assay was performed on a num- ber of these same patients and discordant results were found (Mamotte et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%