2016
DOI: 10.4310/cms.2016.v14.n2.a8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An $H^2$ convergence of a second-order convex-splitting, finite difference scheme for the three-dimensional Cahn–Hilliard equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the · bound for the phase variable, a discrete W 1 , estimate could be derived through a more careful analysis. In more details, by taking a discrete inner product with (2.10) by Δ h 3 ϕ k + 1 , performing a nonlinear estimate, we are able to derive an ( 0 , T ; H h 3 ) estimate for the numerical solution, following similar ideas as in . Subsequently, the discrete W 1 , bound comes from a similar discrete Sobolev inequality: f + h f C f H h 3 .…”
Section: The Fully Discrete Scheme With Finite Difference Spatial Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the · bound for the phase variable, a discrete W 1 , estimate could be derived through a more careful analysis. In more details, by taking a discrete inner product with (2.10) by Δ h 3 ϕ k + 1 , performing a nonlinear estimate, we are able to derive an ( 0 , T ; H h 3 ) estimate for the numerical solution, following similar ideas as in . Subsequently, the discrete W 1 , bound comes from a similar discrete Sobolev inequality: f + h f C f H h 3 .…”
Section: The Fully Discrete Scheme With Finite Difference Spatial Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a stronger convexity of the nonlinear term in the BDF one (2.10) is expected to improve the numerical efficiency in the nonlinear iteration. Such a numerical comparison has been undertaken for the Cahn‐Hilliard (CH) model in recent works: the analogous CN‐ES and BDF2‐ES numerical schemes for the CH equation, proposed in , respectively, were tested using a similar numerical setup. The numerical experiments have indicated that, since the nonlinear term in the BDF2‐ES approach has a stronger convexity than the one in the CN‐ES scheme, a 20 to 25% improvement of the computational efficiency is generally available for the CH model.…”
Section: Preconditioned Descent Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it is important to develop efficient and accurate numerical schemes for their simulation. There exists an extensive literature on the numerical analysis of gradient flows, see for instance [3,14,7,10,23,9,15] and the references therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the Cahn-Hilliard equation represents another type of gradient flows for the phase transition, it has also been numerically studied extensively in the literature [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Here just mention some recent work, Guo et al [23] proposed an unconditionally energy stable finite difference scheme with a modified Crank-Nicolson temporal approximation, a global in time H 2 bound for the numerical solution is derived. Diegel et al [24] proposed a second-order mixed finite element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%