2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2004.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An FPGA platform for on-line topology exploration of spiking neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instantiation of LUTs in VHDL and then automatic place and route is more convenient, flexible, and requires less expert knowledge than earlier EHW approaches, describing manually placed components with e.g. the FPGA Editor [2]. For more complex EHW architectures, several LUTs may have to be combined in order to achieve the desired functionality, and the complexity may prove to be a design challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instantiation of LUTs in VHDL and then automatic place and route is more convenient, flexible, and requires less expert knowledge than earlier EHW approaches, describing manually placed components with e.g. the FPGA Editor [2]. For more complex EHW architectures, several LUTs may have to be combined in order to achieve the desired functionality, and the complexity may prove to be a design challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combinations of these component states can then be instantiated using partial reconfiguration. The drawback of this approach is that the configuration granularity is relatively coarse, and is thus in the context of EHW mostly suitable for modifying architecture parameters [2], [3] or for evolution of systems using high level functions of a certain complexity [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several chapters in [99] are dedicated to this subject, and more recent work can be found for instance in [170,53,77,33,125,116,150].…”
Section: Implementing Snnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reconfigurable architectures, the model can modify the hardware configuration of the chip while the simulation is running. Either through component swapping [12] or network remapping [56], these approaches seek to circumvent scalability limitations, with some success, but with both FPGA's and GPU's scalability has proven to be the main problem, with FPGA's running into routing barriers due to their circuit-switched fabric [33] and GPU's running into memory access barriers. Even more problematic has been power consumption: a typical large FPGA may dissipate ∼ 50W and a GPU accelerator ∼ 200W.…”
Section: Adapted General-purpose Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%