2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
121
3
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
13
121
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the computational load of the planning process should vary with the number of syllable-sized motor programs that need to be retrieved and assembled. On the assumption that multisyllable words require more syllable-sized motor routines than monosyllable words, Shuster and Lemieux (2005) used word length to vary the computational load of planning. It should be noted, however, that their study did not control for utterance length and syllable frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the computational load of the planning process should vary with the number of syllable-sized motor programs that need to be retrieved and assembled. On the assumption that multisyllable words require more syllable-sized motor routines than monosyllable words, Shuster and Lemieux (2005) used word length to vary the computational load of planning. It should be noted, however, that their study did not control for utterance length and syllable frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One strategy for studying narrative production involves examining activation during inner speech (Wildgruber, Ackermann, Klose, Kardatzki, & Grodd, 1996;Wildgruber, Ackermann, & Grodd, 2001). The results of studies involving inner speech are often compatible with those involving actual speech production (Palmer et al, 2001;Rosen, Ojemann, Ollinger, & Petersen, 2000;Shuster & Lemieux, 2005), although this work has focused on single words. Moreover, we wanted to ensure that we were monitoring brain activity during coherent, full narrative production where discourse organization must be explicit rather than during a kind of mental shorthand where organizational links crucial to the coherence of a narrative may not be fully realized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional reports describe studies of speech production during fMRI (Palmer et al, 2001;Rosen et al, 2000;Shuster et al, 2005). fMRI has many advantages over PET due to its superior spatial resolution, non-invasiveness, and absence of ionizing radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The first ROI expected to activate during articulation was the middle portion of the primary sensorimotor cortex (Paus et al, 1996;Indefrey and Levelt, 2000;Lotze et al, 2000;Riecker et al, 2000;Shuster and Lemieux, 2005;Riecker et al, 2005). This ROI included the right and left pre-and postcentral gyri, extending from z = 20 mm to 60 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is much interest in conducting fMRI studies to examine the neurological control for the articulation of speech (Lotze et al, 2000;Riecker et al, 2000;Shuster and Lemieux, 2005;Riecker et al, 2005). Thus far, these experiments have relied on event-related designs and/or subject averaging to reduce the presence of false activation caused by task-correlated orofacial motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%