2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An fMRI investigation of a novel analogue to the Trail-Making Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Activation in the left angular gyrus has been associated with semantic meaning (Seghier et al, 2010; Sharp et al, 2010), more so when there is a conflict involving implausible sentences (Ye and Zhou, 2009) or when the stimulus is emotional (Hervé et al, 2012); it is implicated also in problem identification (Dandan et al, 2013b), in problem solving (Dandan et al, 2013a; Grabner et al, 2013), and in cognitive flexibility (Jacobson et al, 2011). Activation in intraparietal sulcus has been associated with item-specific processing but not with relations among items (Ackerman and Courtney, 2012), with symbolic number processing (Bugden et al, 2012), with attention to items presented in the periphery (Gillebert et al, 2013), and with temporal orienting (that is, attention toward a specific moment in time; Davranche et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation in the left angular gyrus has been associated with semantic meaning (Seghier et al, 2010; Sharp et al, 2010), more so when there is a conflict involving implausible sentences (Ye and Zhou, 2009) or when the stimulus is emotional (Hervé et al, 2012); it is implicated also in problem identification (Dandan et al, 2013b), in problem solving (Dandan et al, 2013a; Grabner et al, 2013), and in cognitive flexibility (Jacobson et al, 2011). Activation in intraparietal sulcus has been associated with item-specific processing but not with relations among items (Ackerman and Courtney, 2012), with symbolic number processing (Bugden et al, 2012), with attention to items presented in the periphery (Gillebert et al, 2013), and with temporal orienting (that is, attention toward a specific moment in time; Davranche et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMT-A is considered to be a measure of visual search/attention skills and psychomotor speed, as its performance has been shown to correlate with scores on other timed tasks which require visual search (e.g., WAIS-III Digit Symbol Coding; Sanchez-Cubillo et al, 2009). TMT-B, on the other hand, is thought of as a measure of executive control, cognitive flexibility, and set shifting, as it is correlated with performance on cognitive alternation and taskswitching tests, as well as increased activation of frontal cortices on fMRI studies and results of prefrontal cortex lesion studies (Crowe, 1998;Yochim, Baldo, Nelson, & Delis, 2007;Jacobson, Blanchard, Connolly, Cannon, & Garavan, 2011). Both parts of the test have exhibited high test-retest reliability (at least 0.76 for Part A, and 0.82 for Part B in recently reported studies), with the coefficient values generally higher for TMT-B compared to A (Lezak et al, 2004;Seo et al, 2006;Wagner, Helmreich, Dahmen, Lieb, & Tadić, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por exemplo, estudos que pretendiam investigar dificuldades no teste de trilhas, especialmente na parte B, como um marcador para disfunção executiva importante associadas à lesão frontal não parecem ser consistentes. Os autores concluíram que independentemente da variável local da lesão, os pacientes com TCE são suscetíveis a realizar erros nesta tarefa e que o bom desempenho parece estar associada à uma rede de ativação que envolvem regiões frontais, não-frontais e regiões subcorticais, geralmente afetadas em pacientes com TcE e presente na da mesma forma heterogeneidade desta amostra (Jacobson, Blanchard, Connolly, Cannon, & Garavan, 2011;Zakzanis, Mraz & Graham, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified