2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An FEM-based approach for tool wear estimation in machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity distribution was calculated using the relative strain history distribution, ε t(i) − ε t(i-1) , divided by the stable simulated time increment, t S , and multiplied with the corresponding distance travelled, d (i−1) , as shown in Equation (6). This approach will eliminate any instability as observed here as well by Malakizadi [16]. Figure 16.…”
Section: Figure 15mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The velocity distribution was calculated using the relative strain history distribution, ε t(i) − ε t(i-1) , divided by the stable simulated time increment, t S , and multiplied with the corresponding distance travelled, d (i−1) , as shown in Equation (6). This approach will eliminate any instability as observed here as well by Malakizadi [16]. Figure 16.…”
Section: Figure 15mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Therefore, cutting speed was used in the wear rate calculations instead of sliding velocity. Malakizadi [16] also made similar observation regarding the instability and used cutting speed instead of sliding velocity.…”
Section: Finite Element Simulationmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to its significant impact on many process characteristics, the understanding and prediction of tool wear in metal cutting have drawn considerable attention [1][2][3][4][5]. The negative impact of tool wear on the surface properties of machined components necessitates a timely change of a cutting tool before a critical level of wear has been reached [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%