An Eye for an Eye

Lankes, Michael; Maurer, Bernhard; Stiglbauer, Barbara

doi:10.1145/3001773.3001774

Cited by 25 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, there are also direct ways (e.g., negotiating with other players) and indirect ways of communicating with other players. For instance, if a player is looking at a specific area of interest on the board, it might reveal crucial information on this very players strategy to opponents [48,49]. This layer of inherent non-verbal interaction of co-located play is primarily related to the physical presence of others.…”

Section: B) A)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dislocated Boardgames: Design Potentials for Remote Tangible Play

Maurer

Fuchsberger

2019

MTI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conventional digital and remote forms of play lack the physicality associated with analog play. Research on the materiality of boardgames has highlighted the inherent material aspects to this analog form of play and how these are relevant for the design of digital play. In this work, we analyze the inherent material qualities and related experiences of boardgames, and speculate how these might shift in remote manifestations. Based on that, we depict three lenses of designing for remote tangible play: physicality, agency, and time. These lenses present leverage points for future designs and illustrate how the digital and the physical can complement each other following alternative notions of hybrid digital–physical play. Based on that, we illustrate the related design space and discuss how boardgame qualities can be translated to the remote space, as well as how their characteristics might change. Thereby, we shed light on related design challenges and reflect on how designing for shared physicality can enrich dislocated play by applying these lenses.

show abstract

Section: B) A)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dislocated Boardgames: Design Potentials for Remote Tangible Play

Maurer

Fuchsberger

2019

MTI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Shahid et al [12] investigated a setting with mutual gaze regarding perceived social presence and game experience, and found out that mutual gaze has a strong effect on the quality of interpersonal interactions between players in a video-mediated gameplay setting. This inclusion of shared gaze-based interaction in both, competitive [7] as well as cooperative gameplay [11], has shown to positively influence social presence, but also drastically changes in how players perceive each other and how they communicate (e.g., via combinations of gaze and verbal communication or by unintended communication via gaze). In a similar direction, Maurer et al [10] investigated a shared gaze approach as a way to integrate a spectator in a co-located gameplay setting into the gaming experience.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First attempts indicate that gaze can be harnessed for onlooker integration resulting in an increased social interaction among participants [10]. Other projects highlight the potential of social gaze in cooperative and competitive game settings (e.g., [7,11]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Eye Contact: Gaze as a Connector Between Spectators and Players in Online Games

Lankes

Rammer

Maurer

2017

Entertainment Computing – ICEC 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This is of significant interest, not least in gaming, of designing interfaces between people in remote locations to increase the sense of social presence between them. The value of displaying an opponent's eye-gaze position in the view a player has of a game in online competitive game play has been studied [Lankes et al 2016], and has been found to increase awareness and engagement between the two players.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Eye gaze and head gaze in collaborative games

Špakov

Istance

Räihä

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research &Amp; Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present an investigation of sharing the focus of visual attention between two players in a collaborative game, so that where one player was looking was visible to the other. The difference between using head-gaze and eye-gaze to estimate the point of regard was studied, the motive being that recording head-gaze is easier and cheaper than eye-gaze. Two experiments are reported, the first investigates the effect of a high immersion presentation of the game in VR Head Mounted Display compared with a lower immersion desktop presentation. The second examines the high immersion condition in more detail. The studies show that in spite of there being many factors that could affect the outcome of a relatively short period of game play, sharing eye-gaze in the high immersion condition produces shorter overall durations and better subjective ratings of team work than does sharing head-gaze. This difference is not apparent in the low immersion condition. The findings are a good argument for exploiting the opportunities for including and using eye tracking within head mounted displays in the context of collaborative games. CCS CONCEPTS• Applied computing → Computer games; • Human-centered computing → Collaborative and social computing systems and tools; Pointing.

show abstract

An Eye for an Eye

Cited by 25 publications

References 16 publications

Dislocated Boardgames: Design Potentials for Remote Tangible Play

Dislocated Boardgames: Design Potentials for Remote Tangible Play

Eye Contact: Gaze as a Connector Between Spectators and Players in Online Games

Eye gaze and head gaze in collaborative games

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About