2003
DOI: 10.1216/rmjm/1181069926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Extremal Nonnegative Sine Polynomial

Abstract: For any positive integer n, the sine polynomials that are nonnegative in [0, π] and which have the maximal derivative at the origin are determined in an explicit form. Associated cosine polynomials K n (θ) are constructed in such a way that {K n (θ)} is a summability kernel. Thus, for each p, 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞ and for any 2π-periodic function f ∈ L p [−π, π], the sequence of convolutions K n * f is proved to converge to f in L p [−π, π]. The pointwise and almost everywhere convergences are also consequences of our con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Problem 52 in [7, p. 79] or (1.3) in [8], a nonnegative trigonometric polynomial of the form…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Problem 52 in [7, p. 79] or (1.3) in [8], a nonnegative trigonometric polynomial of the form…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pioneer work [19], W. Rogosinski and G. Szegő considered and discussed possible ways to solve a large variety of extremal problems for such polynomials. A very particular case of their results reads as follows: for P (z) ∈ T N there holds the exact estimate (1) |a 2 | ≤ 2µ N , N is odd, 2η N , N is even, where µ N = cos 2π N +3 is the largest root of the equation U (N +1)/2 (x) = 0, while η N is the maximal root of U ′ N 2 +1 (x) − U ′ N 2 (x) = 0. Here, U j with j ∈ N 0 denote the Chebyshev polynomials 1 of the second kind and U ′ j their derivatives, defined by…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonnegative trigonometric polynomials and their properties have been actively studied for a very long time, we refer to a survey of Dimitrov [9], the papers [2,4,5,10,18,22] and references therein. One can take these trigonometric polynomials and interpret them as the real part of a polynomial in the complex plane evaluated on the boundary of the unit disk, this leads to the polynomials…”
Section: An Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalized to false|anfalse|=1, it is given by qnfalse(θfalse)=ρn+2k=1nρkncos(kθ),where 0<ρ<1 and n has to be sufficiently large depending on ρ. A slightly less well‐known 1912 example due to Young , again normalized to false|anfalse|=1, is rnfalse(θfalse)=n+k=1nnkcos(kθ).Nonnegative trigonometric polynomials and their properties have been actively studied for a very long time, we refer to a survey of Dimitrov , the papers , and references therein. One can take these trigonometric polynomials and interpret them as the real part of a polynomial in the complex plane evaluated on the boundary of the unit disk, this leads to the polynomials truerightpn(z)=leftn+1+2k=1nfalse(n+1kfalse)zk,2emqn(z)=ρn+2k=1nρknzk,rightrn(z)=leftn+k=1nnkzk.We note that the con...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…91-92]. Variants and generalizations of Lukács' inequality are given in [1], [6], [8]- [11], [15], [16, p. 140]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%