1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0118(199603)21:3<343::aid-jgt10>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extremal function for digraph subcontraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that a weak minor has the same definition as a strong minor except that we only require that the branch sets induce connected (not necessarily strongly-connected) subgraphs. As mentioned in the Introduction, Jagger [11] investigated average degree conditions for finding weak minors in digraphs. In the context of tournaments, we need the following: Theorem 5.5 (Jagger [11]).…”
Section: Large Out-degree In Tournamentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recall that a weak minor has the same definition as a strong minor except that we only require that the branch sets induce connected (not necessarily strongly-connected) subgraphs. As mentioned in the Introduction, Jagger [11] investigated average degree conditions for finding weak minors in digraphs. In the context of tournaments, we need the following: Theorem 5.5 (Jagger [11]).…”
Section: Large Out-degree In Tournamentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the Introduction, Jagger [11] investigated average degree conditions for finding weak minors in digraphs. In the context of tournaments, we need the following: Theorem 5.5 (Jagger [11]). There exists an absolute constant C > 0 such that the following holds.…”
Section: Large Out-degree In Tournamentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The containment of these different minors in dense digraphs as well as their relation to the dichromatic number have already been studied in several previous works, see e.g. [2,8,11] for strong minors, [3,7,12,16] for butterfly minors and [1,4,5,13,14,15,20] for topological minors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a good survey on the relationship between the minor's existence in G and the generalization of the coloring notion to the digraphs we refer the reader to [5], where an oriented version of Hadwiger's conjecture is given, too. Recently, Jagger [6] has shown that if p is large enough, then any digraph on n vertices having at least 10 5 pi/log2 p • n arcs is contractible onto *KP. Nevertheless, this nice asymptotical result does not give a right information about the "little" cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%