Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Managing Technical Debt 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1985362.1985369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extraction method to collect data on defects and effort evolution in a constantly modified system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe four interrelated research streams in the emerging literature on technical debt: (a) taxonomy, frameworks, and perspectives on technical debt [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; (b) identifying, measuring, and visualizing technical debt [9,10,11,12,13,14]; (c) measuring and assessing the impact of technical debt on project and firm performance [6,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]; and (d) decision frameworks for managing technical debt [3,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Moving beyond the metaphorical conceptualization of technical debt, these four streams of research collectively pave a way to develop rigorous empirical models that could be used to derive appropriate policies for managing technical debt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe four interrelated research streams in the emerging literature on technical debt: (a) taxonomy, frameworks, and perspectives on technical debt [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; (b) identifying, measuring, and visualizing technical debt [9,10,11,12,13,14]; (c) measuring and assessing the impact of technical debt on project and firm performance [6,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]; and (d) decision frameworks for managing technical debt [3,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Moving beyond the metaphorical conceptualization of technical debt, these four streams of research collectively pave a way to develop rigorous empirical models that could be used to derive appropriate policies for managing technical debt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual /Introductory (Gomes et al, 2011), (Seaman, Yuepu Guo, et al, 2012), (Morgenthaler et al, 2012), (Falessi, Shaw, et al, 2013), (Daneva et al, 2013), (Ernst et al, 2015), (Martini and Bosch, 2015a), (Martini and Bosch, 2015b), (Leppanen et al, 2015), (Fernández-Sánchez, Garbajosa, et al, 2015), (Martini, Bosch, and Chaudron, 2015), (Riegel and Doerr, 2015), (Martini and Bosch, 2016), (Garousi and Mäntylä, 2016), (Brauer et al, 2017), (Martini and Bosch, 2017), (Hormann et al, 2017), (Becker et al, 2018), (R. d. Almeida et al, 2018), (Pina, Seaman, et al, 2022), (S. Freire, Rios, Pérez, Torres, et al, 2021), (Mandic et al, 2021), (M. Stochel et al, 2022), (Albuquerque et al, 2022), (Wiese et al, 2022), , (S. Freire, Rios, Pérez, Castellanos, et al, 2023), (Alfayez, Winn, et al, 2023(Costa et al, 2022, (Tsintzira et al, 2020), (De Toledo et al, 2022) Mathematical /Statistical (Schmid, 2013), (Fontana et al, 2015), (Skourletopoulos, Chatzimisios, et al, 2015), (Akbarinasaji, 2015), (Mohan et al, 2016), (Codabux and Williams, 2016) Code Metrics (Zazworka, Seaman, and Shull, 2011), (Snipes et al, 2012), (Falessi and Voegele, 2015), (Chatzigeorgiou et al, 2015),…”
Section: Classification Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They define formal ways to manage technical debt and to perform prioritization. (Gomes et al, 2011;Morgenthaler et al, 2012;Martini and Bosch, 2015a). On the other hand, Falessi et al (Falessi, Shaw, et al, 2013) and Stochel et al (M. Stochel et al, 2022) present a practical way to carry out this process without a specific method or tool.…”
Section: Classification Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%