2014
DOI: 10.17487/rfc7263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Extension to the REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Protocol to Support Direct Response Routing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initiator node A asks its neighbor B which is the next hop peer to the destination ID, and B returns a message with the next hop peer C information, along with optional diagnostic information for B to the initiator node. Then the initiator node A asks the next hop peer C (direct response routing [RFC7263] or via symmetric routing) to return next hop peer D information and diagnostic information of C. Unless a failure prevents the message from being forwarded, this step can be repeated until the request reaches responsible peer D for the destination ID and retrieves the diagnostic information of peer D.…”
Section: "Traceroute-like" Behavior: the Pathtrack Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initiator node A asks its neighbor B which is the next hop peer to the destination ID, and B returns a message with the next hop peer C information, along with optional diagnostic information for B to the initiator node. Then the initiator node A asks the next hop peer C (direct response routing [RFC7263] or via symmetric routing) to return next hop peer D information and diagnostic information of C. Unless a failure prevents the message from being forwarded, this step can be repeated until the request reaches responsible peer D for the destination ID and retrieves the diagnostic information of peer D.…”
Section: "Traceroute-like" Behavior: the Pathtrack Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will provide detailed information on RPR. Note that the same types of illustrative settings can be found in Appendix B.1 of [RFC7263].…”
Section: Rprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in Section 3.2.1 of [RFC7263], many P2P systems run in a closed or managed environment so that network administrators can better manage their system. For example, the network administrator can deploy several relay peers that are publicly reachable in the system and indicate their presence in the configuration file.…”
Section: Scenarios Where Rpr Can Be Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations