An extension of the UTAUT 2 with a focus of age in healthcare: What do different ages want?

Murugesh-Warren, Abirami; Dubb, Sandeep; Sudbury, Danny; Saeed, Asad; Nnajiuba, Uzoma; Mashayekhi, Soudeh; Abdel-Gadir, Shadi; Caris, Jochem; Cox, Benita

doi:10.5334/ijic.2273

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Benbasat & Barki (2007) Peneliti menyatakan model TAM sekalipun telah memberikan dampak yang signifikan dalam teori penerimaan teknologi, namun pada sisi lain TAM sudah terlalu banyak direplikasi sehingga telah mengaburkan tujuan sebenarnya dari model TAM. Murugesh-Warren, et al, (2015) Peneliti menggunakan metode UTAUT 2 untuk memahami faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi adopsi dan penerimaan teknologi mobile dalam konteks layanan kesehatan. Menganalisis faktor bagaimana dan mengapa orang menerima atau menolak teknologi dengan variabel moderati usia.…”

Section: Penelitiunclassified

Analisis faktor adopsi aplikasi mobile berdasarkan pengalaman, usia dan jenis kelamin menggunakan UTAUT2

Budiarto

2017

register. jurnal. ilm. teknologi. sistem. inf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Penelitiunclassified

Analisis faktor adopsi aplikasi mobile berdasarkan pengalaman, usia dan jenis kelamin menggunakan UTAUT2

Budiarto

2017

register. jurnal. ilm. teknologi. sistem. inf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This model aims to provide a more consumer-based explanation of BI and use for technology by incorporating a number of additional latent variables, including price, habit, and hedonic motivation. Although the model is geared toward the consumer context, UTAUT 2 has been used in studies addressing technology in the health care context and is emerging in the technology acceptance literature [49]. As the BrainFx SCREEN does not cost the participants money, price would not be a factor that affects BI for this user group.…”

Section: Principal Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technology Acceptance and Usability of the BrainFx SCREEN in Canadian Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods UTAUT Study

Jones

Miguel-Cruz

Brémault‐Phillips

2021

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Canadian Armed Forces service members (CAF-SMs) and veterans exhibit higher rates of injuries and illnesses, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury, which can cause and exacerbate cognitive dysfunction. Computerized neurocognitive assessment tools have demonstrated increased reliability and efficiency compared with traditional cognitive assessment tools. Without assessing the degree of technology acceptance and perceptions of usability to end users, it is difficult to determine whether a technology-based assessment will be used successfully in wider clinical practice. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model is commonly used to address the technology acceptance and usability of applications in five domains. Objective This study aims to determine the technology acceptance and usability of a neurocognitive assessment tool, which was titled BrainFx SCREEN, among CAF-SMs and veterans with PTSD by using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model. Methods This mixed methods embedded pilot study included CAF-SMs and veterans (N=21) aged 18-60 years with a diagnosis of PTSD who completed pre- and postquestionnaires on the same day the BrainFx SCREEN was used. A partial least squares structural equation model was used to analyze the questionnaire results. Qualitative data were assessed using thematic analysis. Results Facilitating conditions, which were the most notable predictors of behavioral intention, increased after using the BrainFx SCREEN, whereas effort expectancy decreased. Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social interaction were not factors that could predict behavioral intention. Participants who reported a previous mild traumatic brain injury were significantly more likely to report current symptoms of cognitive impairment. The BrainFx SCREEN is a feasible, usable, and accepted assessment tool for CAF-SMs and veterans who experience PTSD. Conclusions As military health care systems integrate technological innovations to improve the services and care provided, research must continue to address the acceptability and use of these novel assessments and interventions.

show abstract

Technology Acceptance and Usability of a Virtual Reality Intervention for Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Mixed Methods Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Study

Jones¹,

Miguel-Cruz²,

Smith-MacDonald³

et al. 2022

JMIR Form Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Military members and veterans exhibit higher rates of injuries and illnesses such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) because of their increased exposure to combat and other traumatic scenarios. Novel treatments for PTSD are beginning to emerge and increasingly leverage advances in gaming and other technologies, such as virtual reality. Without assessing the degree of technology acceptance and perception of usability to the end users, including the military members, veterans, and their attending therapists and staff, it is difficult to determine whether a technology-based treatment will be used successfully in wider clinical practice. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model is commonly used to address the technology acceptance and usability of applications in 5 domains. Objective Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model, the purpose of this study was to determine the technology acceptance and usability of multimodal motion-assisted memory desensitization and reconsolidation (3MDR) on a virtual reality system in the primary user group (military members and veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD, 3MDR therapists, and virtual reality environment operators). Methods This mixed methods embedded pilot study included military members (n=3) and veterans (n=8) with a diagnosis of combat-related PTSD, as well as their therapists (n=13) and operators (n=5) who completed pre-post questionnaires before and on completion of 6 weekly sessions of 3MDR. A partial least squares structural equation model was used to analyze the questionnaire results. Qualitative data from the interviews were assessed using thematic analysis. Results Effort expectancy, which was the most notable predictor of behavioral intention, increased after a course of 3MDR with the virtual reality system, whereas all other constructs demonstrated no significant change. Participants’ expectations of the technology were met, as demonstrated by the nonsignificant differences in the pre-post scores. The key qualitative themes included feasibility and function, technical support, and tailored immersion. Conclusions 3MDR via a virtual reality environment appears to be a feasible, usable, and accepted technology for delivering 3MDR to military members and veterans who experience PTSD and 3MDR therapists and operators who facilitate their treatment.

show abstract

An extension of the UTAUT 2 with a focus of age in healthcare: What do different ages want?

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Analisis faktor adopsi aplikasi mobile berdasarkan pengalaman, usia dan jenis kelamin menggunakan UTAUT2

Analisis faktor adopsi aplikasi mobile berdasarkan pengalaman, usia dan jenis kelamin menggunakan UTAUT2

Technology Acceptance and Usability of the BrainFx SCREEN in Canadian Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods UTAUT Study

Technology Acceptance and Usability of a Virtual Reality Intervention for Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Mixed Methods Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About