2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2018.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extension of the pairing theory between divergence-measure fields and BV functions

Abstract: We introduce a family of pairings between a bounded divergence-measure vector field and a function u of bounded variation, depending on the choice of the pointwise representative of u. We prove that these pairings inherit from the standard one, introduced in [6,10], all the main properties and features (e.g. coarea, Leibniz and Gauss-Green formulas). We also characterize the pairings making the corresponding functionals semicontinuous with respect to the strict convergence in BV . We remark that the standard p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Example 6.22 we show that the term C a Du j (Ω) involving the jump part of the variation measure of u is necessary. Very recently, essentially the same result was proved in Euclidean spaces in [13,Proposition 7.3], based on an earlier result [12,Theorem 3.3]. In Euclidean spaces the term C a Du j (Ω) is not needed, but for us the existence of this term makes it necessary to use rather different techniques in the proof, as we will discuss in Remark 6.23.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Example 6.22 we show that the term C a Du j (Ω) involving the jump part of the variation measure of u is necessary. Very recently, essentially the same result was proved in Euclidean spaces in [13,Proposition 7.3], based on an earlier result [12,Theorem 3.3]. In Euclidean spaces the term C a Du j (Ω) is not needed, but for us the existence of this term makes it necessary to use rather different techniques in the proof, as we will discuss in Remark 6.23.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Remark 6.23. Recall that in the Euclidean setting, the term C a Du j (Ω) is not needed (see [13,Proposition 7.3]). Having lim i→∞ Ω g w i dµ = Du (Ω) is in fact used in [13] to prove the pointwise convergence, whereas in our setting it seems necessary to construct the approximations "by hand", which makes the proof of Theorem 1.2 rather technically involved.…”
Section: An Approximation Results For Bv Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, one can easily check that given V satisfying (16)- (18), the vector field η defined as in (19) satisfies (12)- (15). Proof.…”
Section: Counterexamples To Quadratic Rigidity In Dimension N ≥mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, the class DM ∞ (Ω) of divergence-measure, bounded vector fields has been widely studied in view of applications to hyperbolic systems of conservation laws [7,9,10], to continuum and fluid mechanics [8], and to minimal surfaces [28,34] among many others. In particular, the weak normal trace has been studied in different directions, see for instance [1,11,12,13,15,14]. Despite some explicit characterizations of the weak normal trace are available (see the discussion in Section 2.3), a crucial issue coming with this distributional notion is that it is not possible to recover the pointwise value of such a trace by a standard, measure-theoretic limit, see Example 2.7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in some lower semicontinuity problems for integral functionals defined in Sobolev spaces and in BV , the vector fields with measure-derivative occurred as natural dependence of the integrand with respect to the spatial variable (see [8,21,24]). To this end, we address the reader to the forthcoming paper [19], where the authors introduce a nonlinear version of the pairing suitable for applications to semicontinuity problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%