2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2019.108591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extension of the Last-Success-Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among newer examples, and methods of solutions, we cite the work of Goldenshluger et al [12] which includes several such problems in a surprisingly unified form. We also like to mention a paper with a single specific objective function, namely the paper by Grau Ribas [13]. It shows us that, for certain generalisations of a last success objective, the classical dynamic programming approach may have clear advantages.…”
Section: Last Success Problemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among newer examples, and methods of solutions, we cite the work of Goldenshluger et al [12] which includes several such problems in a surprisingly unified form. We also like to mention a paper with a single specific objective function, namely the paper by Grau Ribas [13]. It shows us that, for certain generalisations of a last success objective, the classical dynamic programming approach may have clear advantages.…”
Section: Last Success Problemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…No optimality of the suggested solution can be claimed as for the solution of the Odds-Theorem. This is the price one has to pay for plugging in at each step what one knows so far about p, but not really knowing p. However, it is true that the latter performs in general well if the horizon is large enough for the estimates to have time to converge into a sufficiently close neighbourhood of p. This holds also if we have no prior distribution for p. In this case we propose in (12) to use the estimator pk = k −1 #{heads up to toss k} (15) and the corresponding definitions (13), since ( 15) is a both simple and unbiased estimator of p.…”
Section: Plug-in Odds Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%