1990
DOI: 10.1112/blms/22.2.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Extension of the Ham Sandwich Theorem

Abstract: It is shown that both the ‘ham sandwich theorem’ and Richard Rado's theorem on general measure (see [6]), which is known to be a measure theoretic equivalent of E. Helly's theorem on convex sets, belong to the same family of results about geometric, extremal properties of measures which are defined on Borel sets in Rn.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Establishing the relation between Rado's theorem on general measure (see [11]) and the Ham sandwich theorem, the following result is proved in [21] stating that these two results belong to the same family. Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishing the relation between Rado's theorem on general measure (see [11]) and the Ham sandwich theorem, the following result is proved in [21] stating that these two results belong to the same family. Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cohomological proof of this observation can be found in [5], see also [20], while an alternative proof, based on Schubert calculus, is in [8], section 1.5. From here we deduce that θ k+1 = w k n−k θ = 0 which follows from w k n−k = 0.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n } with the topology inherited from the product space Gr n,n−k × R n , and its projection is (L [5] or [20], Proposition 2, any k continuous cross-sections of this bundle have a common zero. In other words, there exists a plane…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Živaljević and Vrećica [26] give a unification of Rado's Theorem with the Ham Sandwich Theorem: For measures μ 1 , . .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%