1948
DOI: 10.1037/h0054209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extension of Hathaway's MMPI profile coding system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MMPI items refer, sometimes overlapping, to 3 validation scales and to 10 clinical scales. 31,32,33 Individual profiles for the validation scales were inspected in order to ensure the reliability of the tests. Then K-corrected T scores were calculated on the basis of the purified sample of Italian normals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMPI items refer, sometimes overlapping, to 3 validation scales and to 10 clinical scales. 31,32,33 Individual profiles for the validation scales were inspected in order to ensure the reliability of the tests. Then K-corrected T scores were calculated on the basis of the purified sample of Italian normals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Welsh (16) code' was assigned to the overall mean profile for the clinic mothers. This code 3467208195 can be compared with the mean rank profiles for clinic mothers reported by Hanvik (9) 3462780159 and Marks (13) 3426071859.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We asked raters how accurately their clients were described by interpretations based on each of seven codetypes, including the target codetype and six foil codetypes. We wished to evaluate the accuracy ratings against an easily calculated measure of codetype proximity, one that is consistent both with the target codetype selection strategy and the profile's Welsh (1948) code. We therefore assigned a proximity score to the target codetype and to each of the six foil codetypes for each profile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in that study the alternate coding strategies did not necessarily assign the highest rank to the target codetype. In the "Method" section we describe a novel coding strategy that permits the assignment of a score to every possible codetype, very much in parallel with the profile's Welsh (1948) code. We use the resulting codetype proximity scores to assess the relationship between codetype accuracy ratings and codetype proximity, or the codetype's nearness to the profile's actual clinical scale scores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%