2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
228
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 516 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
228
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Sari [10] constructed a new decision model based on an analytical hierarchy process, VIKOR (VIsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje), and Monte Carlo simulation to the assessment for green supply chain management. Qin et al [11] introduced the TODIM method into an interval type-2 fuzzy set and presented an MCGDM approach to handle green supplier selection. To evaluate the green performance of suppliers, Wang et al [3] developed a comprehensive approach according to the cloud model and QUALIFLEX (QUALitative FLEXible multiple criteria) method.…”
Section: Methods For Green Supplier Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sari [10] constructed a new decision model based on an analytical hierarchy process, VIKOR (VIsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje), and Monte Carlo simulation to the assessment for green supply chain management. Qin et al [11] introduced the TODIM method into an interval type-2 fuzzy set and presented an MCGDM approach to handle green supplier selection. To evaluate the green performance of suppliers, Wang et al [3] developed a comprehensive approach according to the cloud model and QUALIFLEX (QUALitative FLEXible multiple criteria) method.…”
Section: Methods For Green Supplier Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group Decision Making is a field that has been present in the literature since the late 80's [2] until nowadays [13,15,19,25,29]. Generally, a typical group decision making problem can be formally defined as follows.…”
Section: Group Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 4: Obtain the evaluative rating (17) of the approximate negative-ideal solution z  with respect to criterion j cC  using (18) and (19).…”
Section: Steps 3-6: Establishment Of Likelihood-based Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…">INTRODUCTIONMultiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) often takes place within a complex and uncertain environment and involve conflicting systems of criteria (Chen, 2017;Qin et al, 2017). Considering the decision maker's point of view and circumstances in the decision-making process, subjective opinions and judgments are inherently imprecise and involve many uncertainties (Chen, 2014a;Singh and Garg, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%