2004
DOI: 10.1086/380392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Extended Star Formation History for the Galactic Center fromHubble Space TelescopeNICMOS Observations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
213
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
15
213
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By modeling the evolution of the population of luminous infrared stars, Figer et al (2004) suggests that the star formation is probably continuous over the last ∼10 Gyr, as we do in this paper. The Kroupa et al (1993) IMF adopted in this work has a slope of −2.7 when M > 1.0 M , derived from the stellar distribution towards both Galactic poles, as well as from the distribution of stars within 5.2 pc from the Sun.…”
Section: Star Formation and Imf In Gcrsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…By modeling the evolution of the population of luminous infrared stars, Figer et al (2004) suggests that the star formation is probably continuous over the last ∼10 Gyr, as we do in this paper. The Kroupa et al (1993) IMF adopted in this work has a slope of −2.7 when M > 1.0 M , derived from the stellar distribution towards both Galactic poles, as well as from the distribution of stars within 5.2 pc from the Sun.…”
Section: Star Formation and Imf In Gcrsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Alexander & Sternberg (1999); Tiede et al (1995); Zoccali et al (2003) measured the power law slope of the bulge population of the milky way several degrees from the center as β ∼ 0.3, while Figer et al (2004) give the same value for the KLF on 30 pc scales around the GC, claiming that this value agrees very well with the theoretical KLF of an old stellar population, reflecting the rate of evolution of stars along the red giant and asymptotic giant branch. Genzel et al (2003) give a value of β = 0.21 ± 0.02 for the central 9 .…”
Section: K Band Luminosity Functionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…They are all located at the near-side of the Galaxy, suggesting that their census is highly incomplete (Messineo et al 2009). A few clusters e.g., the Westerlund I, Arches, and Quintuplet clusters (Westerlund 1961;Cotera et al 1996;Figer et al 1999Figer et al , 2002Figer et al , 2004Clark et al 2005) were known to be massive since the 1990s or even earlier and have been studied at various wavelengths. However, the Arches and the Quintuplet may not be representative of massive clusters elsewhere in the Milky Way because of the peculiar physical conditions in the Galactic center region.…”
Section: Red Supergiants In Stellar Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%