2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-016-1509-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended probabilistic method for reliability analysis under mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainties with flexible intervals

Abstract: The reliability analysis approach based on combined probability and evidence theory is studied in this paper to address the reliability analysis problem involving both aleatory uncertainties and epistemic uncertainties with flexible intervals (the interval bounds are either fixed or variable as functions of other independent variables). In the standard mathematical formulation of reliability analysis under mixed uncertainties with combined probability and evidence theory, the key is to calculate the failure pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific methods could be seen in the article. To delve into the boundary problem of reliability, Chen et al 37 combined probability and evidence based on the reliability analysis method and demonstrated that the upper and lower boundaries of the system response function were measurable under certain circumstances in line with the measure theory. Hence, it is treated as random variable and solved by the probability method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific methods could be seen in the article. To delve into the boundary problem of reliability, Chen et al 37 combined probability and evidence based on the reliability analysis method and demonstrated that the upper and lower boundaries of the system response function were measurable under certain circumstances in line with the measure theory. Hence, it is treated as random variable and solved by the probability method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%