2018 9th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/itme.2018.00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Extended Genetic Algorithm Based Gene Selection Framework for Cancer Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Fig. 8b, GBDT-MVO reach (22) Also, these results proved that our initial objective was realized-improved diagnosis accuracy with reduced diagnosis variance. As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Fig. 8b, GBDT-MVO reach (22) Also, these results proved that our initial objective was realized-improved diagnosis accuracy with reduced diagnosis variance. As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In addition, most of the rules or mathematical equations used by most of the metaheuristic methods have been inspired by the living and survival systems of insects, animals, and birds. Due to the noticeable success of metaheuristic algorithms in solving a lot of optimization problems in a wide range of applications, there are various types of metaheuristic algorithms include Genetic algorithm [21,22], Firefly Algorithm [23], Particle swarm optimization [24,25], Ant Colony Optimization [26], Bat algorithm [27], Whale Optimization Algorithm [28], Artificial fish swarm [29], and Grey wolf optimizer [30] has been extensively reported in recent literature. To classify breast tumors into cancerous and non-cancerous ones, an ensemble learning method was proposed by Vinod Jagannath Kadam et al [17] based on SoftMax Regression and Sparse Autoencoders.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, some hybrid approaches include genetic algorithms to limit the computational costs while evaluating a broader space of possible solutions, as in [7], [8]. Particularly, MOGA approaches have recently raised an increasing interest in gene expression-based classification or clustering tasks [10]- [13], since gene selection problems can be approached from a multi-objective perspective, typically maximizing a performance measure while minimizing the amount of genes retained.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For intrinsically complex, high and heavily unbalanced dimensionalities, as in gene expression datasets, a fourth category has been emerging: hybrid methods; they combine several feature selection and optimization approaches to speed up and improve gene selection. In this trend, genetic algorithms (GA) have become very popular optimization techniques dealing with gene expression data (e.g., see [7], [8]), particularly Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms (MOGA) [9]- [13], which can simultaneously optimize conflicting objectives and find a set of relevant solutions. This enables comparing more and different solutions from a wider range of evaluations, without severely impact the computational costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%