An extended conceptual model of consent for information systems

Bonnici, Christian J.

doi:10.1109/cbms.2013.6627780

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Flick's informed consent theory for ICT [4] is based on Manson and O'Neill's theory, which as argued by Beauchamp, rests substantially on autonomy [37] (p. 59). Bonnici et al considered the concept of beneficence, apart from autonomy, to play an important role in ICT contexts, e.g., see [61,62].…”

Section: Consent As a Construct Based On Autonomy And Beneficencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…As stated by Flick [4] (pp. [62][63][64] and DuBois [58], Manson and O'Neill's theory does not reflect the role that beneficence plays in informed consent or that consent is associated with the promotion of patient well-being, e.g., in cases involving incompetence, emergency, or therapeutic privilege. This is evident, for instance, from the fact that the theory calls for unconditional truth and truthfulness, regardless of whether this would harm the patient.…”

Section: Beneficencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Review of the Consent Management Literature

Bonnici West,

Grima

2024

Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The richness and complexity of consent present challenges to those aiming to make related contributions to computer information systems (CIS). This paper aims to support consent-related research in CIS by simplifying the understanding of existing literature and facilitating the framing of future consent management research. Firstly, it outlines existing consent management research and shows how it relates to the literature in law and ethics. Secondly, it presents some fundamental explanations and definitions that must be considered for further contributions to the consent management literature. Thirdly, it identifies five types of consent-related stances often taken in the consent management literature and explains each in some detail. Fourth, it explains one of the identified types of stances (i.e., the disciplinary stance) by expanding on the links between consent as a legal construct and its ethical counterpart. Fifth, considering another of the identified types of stances (i.e., the theoretical stances normally adopted in the consent management literature), the paper presents the key requirements for legally and ethically effective consent management based on three prominent theories. Sixth, it presents the identified types of stances in a conceptual model, contending that the model is novel, relevant, understandable, and useful.

show abstract