2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43958-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploratory Study on Sociolinguistic Variation of Russian Everyday Speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These corpora contain comments from the social networks Odnoklassniki, Pikabu and the Dvach forum. Studies in sociolinguistics often use corpora of oral communication (Sherstinova, 2009;Bogdanova-Beglarian et al, 2016;Cui, 2019). The most representative corpus of oral communication in Russian is the ORD ("One Speaker's Day"), which contains 240 hours of recordings of everyday telephone conversations (Asinovsky et al, 2009;Sherstinova, 2009).…”
Section: Politeness and Multimedia Corporamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These corpora contain comments from the social networks Odnoklassniki, Pikabu and the Dvach forum. Studies in sociolinguistics often use corpora of oral communication (Sherstinova, 2009;Bogdanova-Beglarian et al, 2016;Cui, 2019). The most representative corpus of oral communication in Russian is the ORD ("One Speaker's Day"), which contains 240 hours of recordings of everyday telephone conversations (Asinovsky et al, 2009;Sherstinova, 2009).…”
Section: Politeness and Multimedia Corporamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In storytelling, writers often have their own styles rooted in different syntactic tendencies (Feng et al, 2012), allowing syntax to become indicators in prediction tasks such as gender (Sarawgi et al, 2011) and authorship (Raghavan et al, 2010) attribution. Syntax also has social connotations in different cultures -for example, in Russia, different social and demographic groups tend to use different syntactic patterns (Bogdanova-Beglarian et al, 2016). Such examples makes syntactic consistency crucial to capture in tasks such as machine translation and dialogue generation so that social conventions are not lost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In storytelling, writers often have their own styles rooted in different syntactic tendencies (Feng et al, 2012), allowing syntax to become indicators in prediction tasks such as gender (Sarawgi et al, 2011) and authorship (Raghavan et al, 2010). Syntax also has social connotations in different cultures -for example, in Russia, different social and demographic groups tend to use different syntactic patterns (Bogdanova-Beglarian et al, 2016). Such examples makes syntactic consistency crucial to capture in tasks such as machine translation and dialogue generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%