2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-013-9234-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploratory study on how primary pupils approach systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The flows of information in a system were particularly complicated to understand. The students could identify the input and often the output of the systems (Koski and de Vries 2013), that is, what systems or components do, but the processes that take place within the systems remained elusive (Mioduser, Venezky, and Gong 1996). One interesting finding here is that the conception of the extension of electricity and telephone infrastructure was quite elaborate for many students, but this infrastructure can still be regarded as a more visible part of these systems (though it still hides the flows, thereby making them more 'invisible').…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The flows of information in a system were particularly complicated to understand. The students could identify the input and often the output of the systems (Koski and de Vries 2013), that is, what systems or components do, but the processes that take place within the systems remained elusive (Mioduser, Venezky, and Gong 1996). One interesting finding here is that the conception of the extension of electricity and telephone infrastructure was quite elaborate for many students, but this infrastructure can still be regarded as a more visible part of these systems (though it still hides the flows, thereby making them more 'invisible').…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…]' (Ginns, Norton, and McRobbie 2005, 47). Koski and de Vries (2013) designed an intervention study in which primary pupils and teachers did a pre-test, the teachers thereafter taught lessons and then the pupils did a post-test, related to how they perceived various aspects of technological systems and how the teaching could be improved. They observed that the concept of input was clearer to the pupils than output, but that the latter conception improved somewhat during the intervention.…”
Section: Pupils' and Teachers' Conceptions Of Technological Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, the majority of students still express difficulty in explaining the components' relationships within the system, as well as the different internal processes, according to previous studies with younger students. Other areas of difficulty for the students' comprehension of systems is identifying the human role in a system, and determining the system's boundaries with its surroundings (Svensson 2011;Koski and de Vries 2013;Mioduser et al 1996).…”
Section: Technological Systems As Subject Matter Within the Technologmentioning
confidence: 99%