2009 IEEE 17th International Conference on Program Comprehension 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icpc.2009.5090045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploratory study on assessing feature location techniques

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IR-based methods have been applied to support practical tasks. For instance, IR methods have been successfully used to support feature location (Liu et al 2007;Eaddy et al 2008;Revelle and Poshyvanyk 2009;Revelle et al 2010;Dit et al 2012a;Dit et al 2012b;, traceability link recovery (Antoniol et al 2002;Hayes et al 2006;De Lucia et al 2007;Cleland-Huang et al 2010;Oliveto et al 2010;Gethers et al 2011), and impact analysis (Antoniol et al 2000;Canfora and Cerulo 2005;Poshyvanyk et al 2009;Gethers and Poshyvanyk 2010;Gethers et al 2012). We do not discuss other applications of IR-based techniques in the context of software maintenance due to space limitations; however, interested readers are referred to (Binkley and Lawrie 2010a;Binkley and Lawrie 2010b) for such an overview.…”
Section: Conceptual Information In Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…IR-based methods have been applied to support practical tasks. For instance, IR methods have been successfully used to support feature location (Liu et al 2007;Eaddy et al 2008;Revelle and Poshyvanyk 2009;Revelle et al 2010;Dit et al 2012a;Dit et al 2012b;, traceability link recovery (Antoniol et al 2002;Hayes et al 2006;De Lucia et al 2007;Cleland-Huang et al 2010;Oliveto et al 2010;Gethers et al 2011), and impact analysis (Antoniol et al 2000;Canfora and Cerulo 2005;Poshyvanyk et al 2009;Gethers and Poshyvanyk 2010;Gethers et al 2012). We do not discuss other applications of IR-based techniques in the context of software maintenance due to space limitations; however, interested readers are referred to (Binkley and Lawrie 2010a;Binkley and Lawrie 2010b) for such an overview.…”
Section: Conceptual Information In Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness measure is an accepted metric to evaluate feature location techniques. It is 6 used here instead of precision and recall to be consistent with previous approaches [22,25] and because feature location techniques have been shown to be better at finding one relevant method for a feature as opposed to many [26].…”
Section: A Systems and Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revelle et al [15] reported that the authors' and several students' validation results agreed over 90% of the time for a certain feature. The observation is promising but not generalizable because it is a single case and the authors have identified only true positives in the results rather than the complete implementation of features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best analysis automatically identified 41-75% of methods modified for a feature request. Revelle et al [15] manually evaluated results of several automated feature location techniques. They reported that the best technique identified three relevant methods among the top ten methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%