2008
DOI: 10.1080/08098130809478204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploratory Study of the Use of Electronic Music Technologies in Clinical Music Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there is a growing demand for music therapists, these electronic music tools offer an objective assessment of their role in music therapy, but guidelines for their application in therapy are lacking [23]. Using MIDI interesting research questions occur and the findings propose a five-step treatment model when using technologies with people with complex needs.…”
Section: Severe/profound Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since there is a growing demand for music therapists, these electronic music tools offer an objective assessment of their role in music therapy, but guidelines for their application in therapy are lacking [23]. Using MIDI interesting research questions occur and the findings propose a five-step treatment model when using technologies with people with complex needs.…”
Section: Severe/profound Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sensory disabilities, motivational problems and specific needs pertaining to expression of identity. Eventually the model emphasizes the importance of positioning technology and establishing cause and effect when working with this population, as well as specific skills required of the therapists when using such tools [23].…”
Section: Severe/profound Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, this narrative structure will create expectations of potential future musical outputs with variations, so that the user can negotiate the shaping of the musical narrative and promote its musical interest at the same time. This is what makes the musical tangibles in RHYME more co-creative than other responsive interactive musical devices, such as Sound Beam and Midicreator (see, for example, Magee & Burland, 2008, www.soundbeam.co.uk) or the lesser-known Jam2jam tool (Adkins, Summerville, Knox, Brown, & Dillon, 2012). Therefore, when compared to traditional musical instruments, such as piano and drums, the CCTs in RHYME feature expanded roles (Cappelen & Andersson, 2011b).…”
Section: Co-creation Interpreted From An Interaction Design Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work on accessible music with focus beyond musical notation include interactive books for sighted children and blind parents (Tollefsen and Flyen, 2008), the Benemin (Challis and Challis, 2008), and Soundbeam (Magee and Burland, 2008). Some of these projects exploit proximity and movement, however, there is little focus on tangible interaction in the music experience (Darrow, 2012).…”
Section: Accessible Musicmentioning
confidence: 99%