2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1114625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploratory Study of Myanmar Culture Using Hofstede's Value Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of an examination of the cultural differences of more than 50 countries, Hofstede reveals four different dimensions: power gap, collectivism vs. individualism, femininity vs. masculinity and risk avoidance. Myanmar was not part of the original Hofstede studies, which is why Rarick and Nickerson (2006) state that there is no empirical data on the cultural classification of the country. Their results, however, show that Myanmar's culture is characterized by a low power gap, high femininity, moderate individualism and a high degree of uncertainty with a moderate long-term orientation.…”
Section: Regulative Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of an examination of the cultural differences of more than 50 countries, Hofstede reveals four different dimensions: power gap, collectivism vs. individualism, femininity vs. masculinity and risk avoidance. Myanmar was not part of the original Hofstede studies, which is why Rarick and Nickerson (2006) state that there is no empirical data on the cultural classification of the country. Their results, however, show that Myanmar's culture is characterized by a low power gap, high femininity, moderate individualism and a high degree of uncertainty with a moderate long-term orientation.…”
Section: Regulative Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High Power Distance was identified as the predominant characteristic for the countries in this region (Hofstede, 1983;Hofstede, Hofstede & Hofstede, 2005). Societies with a high Power Distance Index tend to accept power inequalities, and in these societies people are inclined to depend on those who hold power and authority (Rarick & Nickerson, 2006).…”
Section: Decision Making Stylementioning
confidence: 99%